"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 20, 2003
Soapbox II - Xtreme Government

All considerations of being more objective aside, t's true that to a noticeable extent we're being governed by what I consider right-wing extremists right now.

(Really. Something like turning Guantanamo Bay into a permanent prison we can use for detainees when we don't want to be bothered by the Bill of Rights? The mind boggles. I'm about to digress again, aren't I?)

Because the left lost its focus and its drive, the country has drifted into the hands of the only group left with the passion and the willingness to wrest control for itself. As it happens, those people seem to be right-wing imperialist, interventionist types.

(I'm confronted by a mental picture of the original, "small government/fiscal responsibility" party seeing what the Republican Party has come to these days, and it's not a pretty picture.)

Still. I want to make it clear. There are those in this country, even a majority, who approved of the invasion of Iraq. I believe that a properly worded, properly conducted poll would discover that this majority supported the war almost as much for the humanitarian goals as for eliminating a potential danger to the US.

Should the WMD issue turn out to have been a red herring, I believe that the majority of that majority will not change their overall perception of this war, nor will they change their opinion of GWB's international/military policies. For one thing, there's a contingent (I've talked to some of them) for whom those two trailers are proof positive and in full that Hussein was running a full-out bio-weapons project. Other half-attentive voters heard or read Bush say, "we found WMD" and quit listening, so they'll always believe it.

Others are just...smugly content that it was quick. That fits their idealization of the USofA as some kind of unstoppable force.

(Right here I could go off into another rant on the idiocy of USofA citizens who have seen two "wars" where we've jumped on Iraq with about 400,000 hobnailed boots and warehouses full of long-distance death and who assume from our sanitized television "victories" that the Righteousness of Our Cause has been proven both times, but I won't. For one thing, it's not that simple a subject. Long-distance death does, in fact, save lives. Advanced technological weapons do save civilian lives. Civilians, and soldiers, still die, but fewer of them die when you're using a guided missile system than when you're just raining down bombs all over the place in the hope of hitting something. On the other hand, a cursory study of history suggests that we were "misled" into Gulf War I in much the same way we were misled into Vietnam and Gulf Invasion II, but all of that is outside the scope of this rant which I see has, in spite of my efforts, gone far off-topic.)

Where was I headed? Oh. Yeah, I remember. Extremist government policies.

I don't want to be governed by right-wing extremists, okay?

And, to be very clear, I don't want to be governed by left-wing extremists, either.

I don't want to hug a tree. Trees are dirty and have pointy bark bits that stab you. I don't lack sympathy for those who want to ban animal testing, but common sense tells me it's a better choice than first-round experiments on human beings. I want to protect the environment, but I don't want to give up owning a car. I want recycling and conservation, but I hate those plastic grocery bags that are so thin a quart of milk tears out the bottom and when I try to use the canvas ones, they load them so heavily they're impossible to carry without squishing my food.

Okay, I'm going off on a tangent again, I know, but those grocery bags are a major problem. Plus which, how can I be sure they're made from recycled plastic? What does it take to recycle plastic and am I, in fact, doing more harm to the environment using them than I would be using a paper bag that also claims to be made from recycled material? Should I buy one of those metal carts and use it to tote all of my groceries or are the resources used and the environmental damage caused by manufacturing it actually more significant, cumulatively, than the damage done by all of the grocery bags I'll be using over the next fifteen years?

These are questions we should be considering, but we're being governed by right-wing extremists, so now global warming is an unproven theory, and corporations will, if allowed, frolic happily to their manufacturing plants and voluntarily make reductions in air and water pollution and we'll all live happily ever after.

Posted by AnneZook at 08:11 AM


Comments