"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 18, 2003
Soapbox Warning! (The Liberal Media)

It's my right to dislike the Bush Administration because I disagree with their position on, for instance, protected wilderness areas.

What isn't right is the kind of blind, they are all things evil approach I've taken to everything this Administration does, based solely upon the commentary I've read in the national media. (It's all commentary these days, people, okay? Even in "hard news" articles, you get a lot of bias. Anyone paying attention as they read can find it.)

To put it bluntly, every time someone in the Administration sneezes, I've gone searching for, and found, support for why it was an act of satan. I've lost balance and objectivity and I' saying that this has been a consequence of the actual Liberal Media. (Okay, it's my own fault for trusting the media, I know.)

Because there's nothing so nice as reading the words of those who agree with us, I read ten "Liberal" news outlets for every moderate or right-wing one. And I've been lead, even misled by an overwhelming negativism in the liberal media, into knee-jerk extremism.

For instance, after researching the "facts" of statements offering rationales for the invasion after the fact, I see that while many of the Left's claims of what was said are true, it's also true that there were claims for the invasion made on the grounds of humanitarianism and for protecting Iraq's neighbors, as well as for WMD. I fault the Liberal Media for ignoring that part of what was said in an attempt to force the impression that we were hammered with all WMD, all the time rhetoric for months before the war. This kind of thing doesn't make our arguments any stronger, okay? Bush was wrong to call is "revisionist history" but he would have been right if, instead, he'd talked about "selective memory.")

Doing some further research, I find that the Iraq + terrorist connection was not, in fact, originally made by Bush. This connection has been discussed in Washington for a number of years. For enough years to add a certain credence to the story. I don't find the Liberal Media offering me any data on that because then they might have to admit that this war wasn't quite as unprovoked as they were saying.

(Also, a lack of context is frequently a problem for me. It's clear that I haven't paid enough attention to events as they happened in the Middle East over the last ten years. I'm finding an appalling lack of depth to my knowledge of the region.

Because the national media has been restructured to cover actors and musicians and athletes as "legitimate news" topics, there's less room for actual news, be it on television or in a newspaper, so I'm not finding myself able to fill in the gaps in my knowledge from any coverage the national press is offering. My time, as I've whined repeatedly, is limited, and research takes hours. I'm not saying I'm not doing research, just that I'm a little bitter.)

I'm not saying there's not room to disagree, even passionately, with the current Administration's position on practically everything.

I'm just saying that when it comes to this war, a lot of us are arguing from a greater depth of ignorance than we're aware because the media is less concerned with facts than it is with grabbing headlines and boosting ratings.

There have been a dozen occasions in the last three weeks when I've started to rant and rave about something, stopped myself, and gone searching for actual source material to compare to the news stories. Over half the time, I find that blatant bias in the news story has nearly misled me into screaming in protest about something that's being seriously misrepresented.

I still believe Bush Administration is All Things Evil based on my personal view of what government is supposed to do for citizens, but from now on I'm going to try harder to read actual source material (original text and not the media's edited excerpts of said text) before I jump on the latest hang 'em high bandwagon every time the Administration scratches its ear.

Posted by AnneZook at 08:42 AM


Comments