"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

January 07, 2004
Boggles the mind

From the OpinionJournal today:

Extra
BY JULIA GORIN
The Democratic field: a Jew, a half-Jew, a quarter-Jew and an almost-Jew. Is that good for the Jews?

Not only do I object to classifying candidates based on the degree they do, or don't possess a certain religious/racial affiliation, as though that had anything at all to do with their qualifications for office, I find the very act of defining the extent of "Jewishness" of each person gives the entire column a vaguely racist air.

The race is on. Not for the presidency, but for the Jewish presidency, and the Jewish vote.

It's like the OpJour is, if not endorsing anti-Semitism, at least tacitly alerting their anti-Semitic readers that voting for a Democrat is voting Jewish.

That's really obnoxious, okay?

Posted by AnneZook at 02:59 PM


Comments

But doesn't it blend in rather nicely with the recent Safire piece about Job and Kristoff's piece today? If I believed in conspiracies, I would think these guys are in a locked feedback loop, much like flocking birds and schooling fish. Naw, too Chomsky-esque.

But it is just off the freak-o-meter scale to hear the "jewness" of candidates discussed in the preeminent capitalist media outlet.

This is the 21st century, right?

Oh well, going to be a strange year. . .

Posted by: Hal at January 7, 2004 08:50 PM

I'm constantly puzzled by the sudden (it seems to me) eruption of "Jewishness" as a measure of political ability but then aside from when I'm making fun of religion (or puzzling over why people get so invested in it), it's not something I ever really think about. I don't know the beliefs of 90% of the people I know, nor can I imagine that such beliefs matter.

I know people who believe in tarot cards and who self-identify as wiccan and neither of those beliefs seem to me to be any more or less significant than "Jewish" or "Muslim." Everyone is entitled to their hobby, after all.

Clearly the Right feels that identifying all of the Democratic candidates as "Jewish" is going to help their guy later this year.

It's a cheap shot in a supposedly secular democracy, an attempt to play on the fears of the ignorant who really do believe in world-wide conspiracies, even subconsciously, but the Right is running scared and, unlike its parent publication, the OpinionJournal has never pretended to be rational, unbiased, or even sensible.

Also? Is the extreme Right, as represented by the OpinionJournal, as worried about Dean as they seem to be? Obviously they think they're being clever in pretending publicly he's the candidate they want the Dems to field but it's pretty clear they hope they'll scare Democrats into nominating someone else.

Posted by: Anne at January 8, 2004 10:42 AM

Another banned IP - Anne

Posted by: phentermine at February 15, 2004 03:50 PM