Warning: include(/home/annezook/public_html/sidebar.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/annezook/public_html/archives/001008.php on line 91

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/annezook/public_html/sidebar.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/annezook/public_html/archives/001008.php on line 91
January 16, 2004
Huh.

I think this appointment should be overturned. Using a Congressional recess to slap your political opponents in the face . . well, it's the kind of arrogance this Administration is prone to, yes, but it's a bad move. *

Who gets divorced? (Hint: Bush's constituency.)

Hee. Hee.

( * I'm just saying. I'm beginning to wonder if this Administration's complete disregard for the future fallout of their behavior doesn't have a rather obvious foundation. If the constant trumpeting of The Wonderfulness of George, complete with multiple photo-ops where he turns up wearing a halo, isn't trying to cover up one, simple fact.

The Republican leadership is trying to hide the fact that they don't believe Bush is electable.

He wasn't elected last time, and he didn't have Afghanistan and Iraq and the disaster of Medicare and tax give-aways to wealthy friends dragging at his heels then.

And now? Is the guy electable?

If they thought he was, would they have started raising such obscene amounts of money so early in the election cycle? If they think he's so beloved of the American People, just why, exactly, did they think he needed $300 million or however much he's raised in order to get re-elected?

Think about it.)

Posted by AnneZook at 02:30 PM


Comments

Thanks so much for the divorce link. A much needed smile in advance of the State of the Re-Election Campaign speech.

And the Pickering appointment is kind of a mixed blessing: a fabulous campaign issue for Democrats and Republicans alike. What will be interesting (is there a reporter in this country capable of following up on a story like this?) is what Pickering does as a judge: he'd better be on his best behavior for the next 11 months.....

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at January 20, 2004 02:53 AM

You may be right about the Pickering appointment and I hope someone does track and publicize what he does over the next 11 months. And for longer.

In the end, I'm more concerned about the cumulative effects of a slate of conservative judges over couple of decades or more than about the possibility that one judge will do something entirely outrageous. Without doing any one thing that's actionable (and he'd be crazy to do anything like that after the controversy surrounding his nomination), Pickering could still have a very negative impact on the balance of the bench.

I don't object to conservative judges per se, but there's a limit. I distrust "activist" conservative judges more than "liberal" activist judges, but that's probably because I'm not a conservative.

Posted by: Anne at January 20, 2004 12:47 PM