"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

January 16, 2004

I think this appointment should be overturned. Using a Congressional recess to slap your political opponents in the face . . well, it's the kind of arrogance this Administration is prone to, yes, but it's a bad move. *

Who gets divorced? (Hint: Bush's constituency.)

Hee. Hee.

( * I'm just saying. I'm beginning to wonder if this Administration's complete disregard for the future fallout of their behavior doesn't have a rather obvious foundation. If the constant trumpeting of The Wonderfulness of George, complete with multiple photo-ops where he turns up wearing a halo, isn't trying to cover up one, simple fact.

The Republican leadership is trying to hide the fact that they don't believe Bush is electable.

He wasn't elected last time, and he didn't have Afghanistan and Iraq and the disaster of Medicare and tax give-aways to wealthy friends dragging at his heels then.

And now? Is the guy electable?

If they thought he was, would they have started raising such obscene amounts of money so early in the election cycle? If they think he's so beloved of the American People, just why, exactly, did they think he needed $300 million or however much he's raised in order to get re-elected?

Think about it.)

Posted by AnneZook at 02:30 PM


Thanks so much for the divorce link. A much needed smile in advance of the State of the Re-Election Campaign speech.

And the Pickering appointment is kind of a mixed blessing: a fabulous campaign issue for Democrats and Republicans alike. What will be interesting (is there a reporter in this country capable of following up on a story like this?) is what Pickering does as a judge: he'd better be on his best behavior for the next 11 months.....

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at January 20, 2004 02:53 AM

You may be right about the Pickering appointment and I hope someone does track and publicize what he does over the next 11 months. And for longer.

In the end, I'm more concerned about the cumulative effects of a slate of conservative judges over couple of decades or more than about the possibility that one judge will do something entirely outrageous. Without doing any one thing that's actionable (and he'd be crazy to do anything like that after the controversy surrounding his nomination), Pickering could still have a very negative impact on the balance of the bench.

I don't object to conservative judges per se, but there's a limit. I distrust "activist" conservative judges more than "liberal" activist judges, but that's probably because I'm not a conservative.

Posted by: Anne at January 20, 2004 12:47 PM