"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

January 19, 2004
Can they do that?

It just doesn't seem constitutional to create confidential lists of "good" and "bad" airline passengers. What's the criteria? Who's going to get searched? If someone with no connection to terrorism is inconvenienced and searched repeatedly, can they sue the feds for harassment? How about someone targeted as a Dangerous Red? Can they sue for defamation of character after they lose their job because they couldn't go on that business trip and the designation made their boss decide they could do without the problem?

(And what's up with the people dying on airplanes, anyhow?)

If someone is already in court, defending themselves on a dubious charge I might add, can you lure their lawyer away so you can arrest them again? (Don't make snap decisions. the subject isn't as clear-cut as some would have you believe.)

Looks like some people are about to boycott Coke if the multinational corporation doesn't clean up its act and its disgusting production methods.

Me, I disapprove of all soft drinks on principle. Loads of useless sugar, tons of artificial chemicals, no food value. But I'm aware that it's easy for me to be all sanctimonious when I've never been a pop-fancier, so I don't really expect the country to give up its passion for the stuff. Not even if they read the story. USofA citizens will do just about anything except inconvenience themselves or do without something they want for more than just a short time.

Will the U.N. bail us out in Iraq or leave us to clean up our own mess?

Remember how the Bush Administration once claimed that Iraq oil revenues would be used to pay for reconstruction? Not.

Dick Meyer does the country a disservice by referring, even tangentially, to Bush's "kindler, gentler immigration reforms." What Bush proposed is nothing of the sort. It is, in fact, a way to combine access to cheap labor for southern states with a tracking program that will help more easily discover and expel foreign nationals when we're tired of them (or when they become so skilled at whatever it is they're doing that they're on the verge of making some, you know, decent money at it.). Meyer saves most of his ire for the laughable NCLB, as well he should.

Molly Ivins doing what she does best. (Well, sort of. While I'm all over the idea of mocking Bush because he's completely unable to control the people he's put into power, the truth is that a remark like that could do the guy nothing but good with the voting population. Unless, of course, the Administration were about to demand a new round of tax cuts for the rich which, surprise, surprise, we hear they care. After that, the only way such a remark could help him would be to gain him a pity vote from the clueless nitwits who will feel sorry for him because he's only allowed to play with the presidential mantle, he's not allowed to really wear it) Anyhow, aside from the quote, she makes, as always, good sense.

I don't remember where I found the link, but What Makes a Terrorist? is interesting reading.

Naturally I'll be following on-line caucus news closely today. Looks like Kerry was well-positioned going into the day.

Posted by AnneZook at 08:50 AM


Comments

"USofA citizens will do just about anything except inconvenience themselves or do without something they want for more than just a short time." Rather contemptuous of your fellow citizens, aren't you?

Posted by: Andrew at January 19, 2004 09:00 AM

Sometimes, yes. There are a lot of things I think people would make sacrifices for, but it depends on what they're being asked to sacrifice.

Anyhow, remember that I'm a USofA citizen myself. When I make those kinds or remarks, I am not exempting myself from my own disdain. Nothing I've learned about the potentially damaging practices of Starbucks, for instance, has yet driven me to give up my morning Americano.

Posted by: Anne at January 19, 2004 10:18 AM