"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

January 19, 2004
Politics and Porn

Hey, I like Kerry. I've said so before. I'm quite pleased he did well and quite perturbed at the mean-spirited and even petty insults being tossed his way by disgruntled bloggers from the Left.

The placings in Iowa surprised me, though. I didn't expect to see Dean that far down. Is the Republican determination to quash the possibility of a Dean nomination bearing fruit among Democrats?

Also, Avedon Carol (also in the comments below) is quite right. Porn for men is easy. Female and nekkid is all it takes, but women aren't quite that easy.

But, me, I'm shallow. I can still get quite a lot of pleasure from looking at an attractive, nekkid man. Even sans erection.

(I do rather suspect that it's not quite the same reaction a man has to porn, though. Heh.)

Posted by AnneZook at 09:48 PM


Comments

Maybe there isn't more female-gaze-directed porn because women are more likely than men to say "you know? what I get off on really isn't any of your business." :)

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at January 20, 2004 03:55 AM

I suppose it's too much to consider that Dean didn't do well because he failed to attract Democrats, or does the vast right wing conspiracy extend far enough to control even the Democratic Party?

As for porn, I personally need a little something more than just a naked woman, but I'm probably just different. ;)

Posted by: Andrew at January 20, 2004 06:01 AM

Anne: I'm quite perturbed at the mean-spirited and even petty insults being tossed his way by disgruntled bloggers from the Left.

I'm not seeing this, Anne. Can you back this up?

Posted by: Retrogrouch at January 20, 2004 08:36 AM

Oooh! Comments!

Elayne: If we're that coy about what we like, we might not get it. That's all I'm saying.

Andrew: By now, you know that I'm prone to sweeping, half-considered generalizations from time to time. Obviously there are a lot of men for whom the sight of an undraped female figure, just any random female of a certain age group, is insufficient for arousal. Men of uncommon intelligence, charm, and sophistication. :)

As for Dean's appeal to Democrats, well, who knows?

My personal opinion has always been that a lot of Dean's popularity was a media creation. The media was so thrilled to have a "new angle" to use to write about over the past few months (the "WWW" angle) that they practically saturated the news with discussions of Dean's on-line strength, his fund-raising, his "anger," his anti-war speeches, his anti-Bush speeches, and endless debates over the depth of his appeal to the voters.

Had said media coverage been more evenly spread among all viable candidates, maybe the media 'pundits' wouldn't have fallen for their own rhetoric and found themselves floundering last night?

Of course, one state can be an anomaly. I could be wrong and Dean could come out strong in New Hampshire. It's going to be interesting to watch.

In the end, I'm pleased, very pleased, that the voters chose based on the candidate they wanted and not the candidate the media told them to want.

Posted by: Anne at January 20, 2004 12:40 PM

Ooops. Missed one.

Retrogrouch: Unfortunately, I don't always have the same bookmarks on my computer here at the office as I do on my home computer I'll take a look as I blog around today, okay? The only one that sticks in my mind at the moment was someone who referred to Kerry as "droopy drawers" or something similar. Embarrassingly childish. (I tend to delete these bookmarks when I see a post like that but I might be able to retrieve that one or one of the others I saw last night.)

Posted by: Anne at January 20, 2004 12:41 PM

To Retrogrouch: If I had been keeping up with what was going on, I'd probably have written one of those mean-spirited attacks on Kerry. As it is, I just got up this morning and did a double-take when I saw the paper.

Anne: could well be that concerns about electability are circulating. And at this point, what does it matter if a candidate was against the war before it started? I checked out a comparison between Dean, Kerry, and Lieberman's proposals on Iraq's reconstruction at the Dean website, and there's not a lot of difference between them—and I preferred Lieberman's proposal for the War Crimes Tribunal better to Dean's (non) proposal.

Read Kerry's health care proposal paper at his website and (mostly) liked it. Saw Edwards' and wanted to scream.

Posted by: Curtiss Leung at January 20, 2004 04:32 PM

Coy? Or, you know, private?

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at January 21, 2004 11:57 AM

Well, I'm not talking about sharing the absolute details. :) If you prefer a chicken to a feather, that's cool.

I was only referring to "beefcake" to the extent of having the opportunity to stumble across an image or concept that's appealing from time to time.

Posted by: Anne at January 21, 2004 02:12 PM

Hello

Posted by: politics at February 19, 2004 12:43 AM