"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

January 23, 2004
This

In this, Molly Ivins takes a few shots at Kerry, begrudgingly admits there's something there in Edwards, then spends a long time talking about how Dean didn't get a fair break because he's not a Washington insider and the media ganged up on him and he's still the guy for her before she turns her attention to Bush.

Not up to her usual form. I mean, clearly she tried, but just as clearly, Dean's third-place finish in Iowa still smarts and she's blaming the media for how it covered him. Not candidates in general, just him. She may be right. The "media" sure has been quick to declare Dean's candidacy a has-been based on, as near as I can tell, wishful thinking.

(Read this for one person's view on the steps campaign coverage takes.)

I don't know how to respond to this. Some of it is true, some of it is possible but unlikely, and some of it is just paranoia. (The idea, for instance, that the instant a reformer gets power in the government system, they become part of the problem, is manifestly untrue.) It's all a bit much for me and I'm not buying most it, in spite of seeing it copied in so many places today.

And then there's this discussion of terrorism, its aims and goals, and the author's frustration that so few people in this country bother to try and understand what's going on. (And yet, once again, the author goes that one step too far in insisting the al Qaeda will do whatever it takes to get Bush re-elected.)

What's up with these columnists today? Have they all eaten largely of the fruit of paranoia or what?

But this has the ring of truth. Few of us would be able to face the poverty and disease O'Neill saw without developing a desperate desire to give some of our bounty, some of our excess, to help people for whom so little could mean so much. Unfortunately for O'Neill, it sounds like he's working with a group of the few. You don't have to look overseas to find proof of that.

And this will please you small-government conservatives. Bush intends to spend less on everything next year. (Well, everything except death.)

This starts with a giggle and is interesting to read. What more could you ask for?

And now, I have to go to work.

Posted by AnneZook at 07:40 AM


Comments