"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

February 04, 2004
What I Would Have Talked About

If I'd had time to blog today.

I'd have discussed how the Massachusetts ruling is going to make the religious conservatives scream and how it's the first step toward the inevitable division between a "civil union" (for everyone, het, gay, bi, trans, whatever) that's the piece recognized by the law and "marriage" as a purely religious institution. This will allow different religions to take their own stance based on their dubious standards of morality and keep the state and church separate on this subject. Mark my words. Some day, most of us will be wearing the union label.

I'd have puzzled over just exactly when the CIA's mandate changed. You know, the one that forbid them to conduct operations on USofA territory.

I would had a few rude things to say about Republicans against ethics.

I would have made yet another post on the horrors of executing the mentally incompetent.

I might have wept, but I would surely have ranted about this Auschwitz comparison and about how true it is.

I would have said to take a look at this site, which is new to me.

I would have recommended we all bookmark this site since I'm sure we're all gathering various primary-related sites to check over the next few months.

I would have been shaking my head over this, and this and this especially, with the list of USofA companies documented as having done the kind of business with Iraq that can lead to development of WMD.

Posted by AnneZook at 01:54 PM


There was a shift in the rules about where the CIA could wark after 9/11 that was supposed to be about sharing information with the FBI.

We need some real oversight on intelligence agencies. I was part of NSA when I was in the military and our rules were crystal clear.

Posted by: Bryan at February 4, 2004 04:51 PM

I first encountered "civil unions" when a European friend got married in Amsterdam. There were two entire ceremonies: most of the honorees and attendants at the religious ceremony were family; the civil ceremony was mostly friends. Two parties, with two cakes.....

You'd think there was a wedding planners' lobby out there pushing for this.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at February 4, 2004 10:57 PM

Bryan - I'd find it reassuring if most of the citizens of this country even understood just how many 'security agencies' we're running. And some of them puzzle me. Why, for instance, does the Department of Energy need an intelligence force?

Jonathan - That's a brilliant idea. I know there are already wedding planners targeting gay couples but the notion that the industry could nearly double its business by providing 'civil ceremony' trappings along with the more traditional festivities...it's brilliant!* And just think how good it would be for the economy. Heh.

(* I can use exclamation points. I'm an amateur, so I'm exempt.)

Posted by: Anne at February 5, 2004 11:08 AM

Has someone been policing exclamation points again?!? Don't they have anything better to do!?!

But seriously, what's the point of having a punctuation mark that's "improper to use in polite company"?

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at February 5, 2004 05:34 PM

Well, considering that I just dissed Taranto for his use of exclamation points, I felt a bit guilty about using them myself, you see.

I just think Taranto's are...let's say, inappropriately placed. The use of exclamation points in "journalism," even in opinion/commentary, used to be vanishingly rare. The OpinionJournal, and Taranto in particular, uses them frequently to create the sense of a scandalous revelation.

Posted by: Anne at February 6, 2004 11:00 AM