"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 03, 2004
No Particular Theme

This appears to be a serious article, but my brain is fixated on a picture of Bush as the "L'il Pretzel." I may have to rescind my self-imposed ban on name-calling for that one.

“We are literally here at the direction of the president of the United States to make sure that each and every one of you has the opportunity to be involved in one of the truly major business undertakings of this century,” said Gen. Patrick Rea, regional administrator of the SBA. And it’s some undertaking. The total value of contracts, Rea assured, “could move to the figure of a half a trillion dollars.”

Reducing the Iraq war and subsequent occupation to a business opportunity is disconcerting enough, but far more bizarre was the subtle yet consistent message that Iraqi reconstruction constitutes a comprehensive domestic economic policy agenda. “We’re all looking for what are those 21st Century jobs,” Rea told the crowd. “You’re sitting in a room where they’re going to unfold by the thousands.”

That's the Bush Administration, inviting small business to join in the fun and profiteering in Iraq.

China seems to think the Bush Administration's nation-building in the middle-east could work, but the article worries me by how casually it accepts the (really, astonishing) scope of what the current administration wants to do.

Men, women, pr0n, and computers and suddenly I'm sort of glad I stuck with the GameBoy and didn't ever get game-geeky enough to want a PlayStation. But maybe I'm just old-fashioned.

Also, Aristide may, indeed, be "Castro-lite" (as Elayne said in earlier comments), but I'm completely and entirely underwhelmed by the ragtag collection of murderers, drug-dealers, and torturers that make up the ranks of the "rebels" claiming power in Haiti.

Last night on NPR, a commentator argued convincingly that the biggest problem in Haiti is that we installed Aristide and then washed our hands of the situation, as though one man, no matter how democratically elected, would be able to single-handedly create and support the democratic framework the country would need to thrive and survive in freedom. I'm not sure any of us who rely upon the USofA press know who Aristide is but, I'm not prepared to join the ranks of those opposing him.

Disturbing reading.

Andrew Greeley, writing from another planet, insists that celibacy (and the lack thereof, accompanied by a frenzy of child-molesting and a massive, world-wide, decades-long cover-up by authority) isn't what's wrong with the church. After all, a bare 4% of priests actually assault underage parishioners and priests, when asked, say that life is good under the robe, so clearly there ain't no problems there.

No, no, what priests need to do to rehabilitate the church is write better sermons.

Did anyone at the NYT read this stuff before they agreed to publish it? Did it occur to anyone to take Greeley's temperature, on the chance that he might be feverish and delusional?

Posted by AnneZook at 08:33 AM


Comments