"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 19, 2004

Always read Avedon Carol, who led me today to Kathryn Cramer and the connection between that planeload of mercenaries and the supposedly defunct army-for-hire, Executive Outcomes.

And, speaking of mercenaries and private armies, read Juan Cole. (Edward at Fistful of Euros has an opinion about the situation.)

Also read Holy Warriors at Avedon Carol's site.

John McKay has a very interesting post up about "imperfect knowledge" when it comes to science versus, well, those who want to disprove what scientific inquiry suggests is true.

Chris at Back To Iraq has a good post up on the latest Baghdad bombing.

Riverbend is also talking about that and other Baghdad happenings.

Pandagon points out one of the tactics from the Bush Administration that should be making us all mad.

Always read Molly Ivins, too. She's the only writer I've ever read who manages to make Texas's problems funny.

Jane Galt talks about China trying to shut down Chinese access to blogs.

Via Eric Alterman's column today, we see what purports to be a collection of Park Service memos about funding and service cuts. Rather than focusing on what Alterman's correspondent saw as the inequity of the Park Service's attempt to mislead the media (and in turn the public) about services provided, I see this as proof of the Bush Administration's ongoing disinterest in and disdain for what most voters would see as a logical and proper function of government - the adequate administration of our public areas.

I'm just saying. You can't say they don't walk the talk. They said they didn't believe in 'big government' and almost everything they're doing, from tax cuts for the wealthy to under-funded education mandates to budget-busting Medicare 'reforms' is designed to achieve one goal - to break the power of the federal government and force the states to pick up the slack by raising taxes and providing new and expanded services.

Those of you who think there isn't any method in the madness are wrong.

For more wrongness, take a look at Andrew Olmsted today who points out an essential wrongness.

Acts of terrorism are going to affect any election in any country touched by such insanity. Calling for any candidate to bow out because of such an act...well, you're letting the terrorists win because you're letting them dictate who will or will not be allowed to run for office.

Besides, that, if it's appropriate for Bush to run based on what he claims he's doing to fight terrorism, then it's appropriate for us to vote based on the consequences of those actions.

David Neiwert is discussing domestic terrorism.

Winston Smith asks an interesting question. "What if Bush lied in order to get us to do the right thing?"

This idea occurred to me before, but I dismissed it as irrelevant because, as y'all know, I don't believe the end justifies the means.

Also? Based on the massive instability in Iraq, I'd imagine that it's becoming clear to anyone who supports this theory that the consequences of lying to achieve your ends, regardless of the merit of those ends, creates its own problems.

And you should read this article about the continuing squabble between the judiciary and the legislative branches over the latter intruding on the former's prerogatives and responsibilities.

Go, says TBogg.

Posted by AnneZook at 12:29 PM


I just want to thank you: your blogarounds and roundups save me immense quantities of time. Actually, that's not true. If you didn't do it, I probably just wouldn't read most of it, or I'd hear about it much later. My time in blogspace is limited by real life, and I make very efficient use of it here.

The handcuffing of judges is turning what should be a balanced and independent system into a more French (also Japanese) style system in which the administrative branch (unelected and not responsible to anyone except their political masters) prosecutors have all the discretionary power.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at March 19, 2004 01:56 PM

Timeliness is everything in the world o'blog. :) My blogarounds tend to be skimpy compared to most, but I'm glad to hear I'm not just linking to things everyone has already read.

The administrative branch's tendency to try and steer the judiciary's horse isn't new and in fact I think that kind of tension between the branches is a good sign - it shows that no one branch has yet managed to co-opt the power of the others.

At the same time, too much of this kind of squabbling also leads me to fear that one branch is, in fact, making an attempt to co-opt the power of another. It's tricky.

That's the thing about a "balance of powers" isn't it? "Balance" is a fairly delicate thing.

The system we have is robust and can withstand a fair amount of tinkering but I honestly do think this Administration goes too far.

Posted by: Anne at March 19, 2004 04:10 PM