"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 26, 2004
Quick Links

Afghanistan is getting a little attention. We're sending another 2,000 Marines in.

The blue butterfly is making a return in the U.K.

'My Lai' and 'hero' aren't words you often find together.

Wriggling around looking for loopholes is normally the kind of thing that annoys me, but let's be honest here. No sane person could advocate removing the troops from Iraq, pretending to believe that the magic of a hasty cycle of elections would automatically impose safety, security, and order on the country.

It's nice that Libya decided to come clean and abandon their WMD program but I'm displeased by the stories starting to spread that say our initial reports inflated the number and capability of their weapons and programs. Not surprised, you understand. I'm getting used to mentally discounting Administration threat estimates by at least 25%. But it still annoys me.

Krugman says Social Security and Medicare aren't the same thing, and they aren't in that much trouble. It mostly boils down to the fact that there are problems but if the government wants to, if can fix the programs. And he says privatization isn't the answer, big surprise.

china has some suggestions for how the UsofA can improve its image abroad. Start with the idea that we shouldn't assume that people don't understand us just because they oppose us.

Personally, I think the 527s supporting both sides should be investigated. I'm sure there's enough skating near and even over the line on both sides to go around.

It's good to be a liberal.

Posted by AnneZook at 09:18 AM


Comments

Liberal used to mean someone who agreed with Adam Smith and J.S. Mill, that government should protect us from each other, provide important collective projects, and otherwise stay out of our way. The "protect us from each other" morphed into "and ourselves" and "collective projects" became nation-building exercises like compulsory education, central banks, and welfare systems.

Round about 1900, liberal stopped meaning anything really. Now, classical liberalism is like a moderate libertarianism, and I usually describe myself as an enraged moderate progressive.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at March 28, 2004 12:03 AM

Well, I could get behind being an EMP :) but I don't really have a problem with the fact that the meaning of the word "liberal" has changed over time. Language is a living tool, after all.

Posted by: Anne at March 29, 2004 08:22 AM

True. But not enough people recognize that a term like "liberal" is both poorly defined in the present and historically slippery. It makes my job as a teacher a little difficult, when "conservative" and "liberal" mean such different things at different times. And it makes my political life difficult, that people will label me "liberal" and ignore the vast differences between me and whatever it is they think they mean because Fox news is making it sound dirty.

I actually wrote a letter to the editor back in the early nineties, in which I refered to the "l------" word, and being San Francisco, they filled in "lesbian." Poor Michael Dukakis.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at March 29, 2004 02:13 PM

ROFL! That's a pretty good one.

But seriously. I know the people I used to think of as "liberal" have, to some extent, begun referring to themselves as "progressive" these days, and it aggravates me.

Yes, I know the Right has worked hard for over twenty years to make "liberal" a bad, bad word, but we're not required to let them dictate terms like that, are we?

I say the best thing we can do is to define the word, or find one we can live with for the foreseeable future, and get on with the job.

(For what it's worth, when I was in college, I loved that kind of thing. Tracking changes in the meaning of a word over time. Didn't matter if it was political, social, economic, whatever. I think it's fascinating. And, of course, educational.)

Posted by: Anne at March 30, 2004 08:11 AM