"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 26, 2004
Late breaking peeves

It's a good thing that UsofA soldiers are buying their own armor. No one else is buying them any and an Iraqi cleric calling 9/11 and 3/11 "miracles from god is a bad, bad sign for the future.

The right to legal representation and to file charges when you've been wronged is one thing. Filing idiotic nuisance suits to delay your own trial on a criminal charge is quite another.

More bad news for the Bush Administration. MCI is laying off 4000 employees, blaming the Do Not Call law.

We're winning friends and influencing people all around the world again. We've added Thailand and the Philippines to the Axis of (terrorist) Evil and they're not happy about it.

Bah. I'm going home.

Posted by AnneZook at 05:26 PM


Comments

It's a good thing that UsofA soldiers are buying their own armor. No one else is buying them any

Ummm, you do realize this is factually untrue, right? The Army is purchasing body armor in wholesale lots, now that the funding is available. This is just another example of what happens in peacetime: the Army had to decide what to spend its dollars on, and it chose not to buy body armor. A bad choice in retrospect, but do you have any suggestions for what they shouldn't have paid for instead?

Posted by: Andrew at March 26, 2004 05:57 PM

"Peacetime." Hmm. Peacekeeping Times, is more like it. US troops have been involved in nearly continuous interventions for some time now, operations in which small arms fire is usually the primary issue. Seems to me that they could have cancelled the "supertank" a few years earlier, or perhaps the "joint strike fighter" which will replace about three really well designed task-oriented aircraft with one compromise kluge.

It's just too easy....

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at March 27, 2004 11:52 PM

among the manymanymany things the Pentagon should have passed up on its way to the body armour superstore, are cluster bombs and landmines.

Posted by: pericat at March 28, 2004 10:03 AM

Sorry, Andrew, but I'm with Jonathan on this one. Based on the kind of "combat" our troops have been most involved in over the last fifteen years, I would have elected body army over any number of overly ambitious, doomed projects.

But don't misunderstand me on this. I'm not faulting the military. I know that the money they get can sometimes be tied up, earmarked for certain (porkbarrel) projects, leaving them short of funds for the less-sexy but more important fundamentals. The DoD gets billions and billions of dollars every year, but many times their hands are tied over how they can spend the money.

Nor am I against research. Exactly. I mean, I wish one of our main contributions to the modern world wasn't an ever-increasing variety of ways to kill each other. At the same time, I'm not unaware of the significant civilian side benefits that some of these projects produce.

It's a dilemma for me, but I always go back to the idea that the soldier on the front line really should be the first consideration.

Posted by: Anne at March 29, 2004 08:41 AM