"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 31, 2004
Talk, Talk, Talk

I'm glad there's going to be a Left/Liberal talk radio network and I'm not that worried about the inexperience thing. I just wish I could hear it in Denver.

But if it fails, I predict it will fail because the Talking Left can't offer what the Talking Right has to offer.

Right-wing radio boasts racism, sexism, and bigotry, all packaged up in emotionally charged rhetoric that pretends the listener is in some way superior to all of "them".

(Amazingly rude paragraph about the fear-based mentality and emotional immaturity of right-wing extremist supporters removed from this spot. No charge for the self-censorship. A loser is a loser, in any decade and these listeners are cannon fodder for the extreme Right. They either don't know that, or don't care.)

All the Left can offer is a desire to openly debate the issues and to come to a mutual understanding that benefits the most possible people. It doesn't quite offer the same excitement, does it?

In a nation of adults, it would be enough, but we seem to be a national of emotionally and mentally stunted adolescents. Not, you know, as a majority of the people, but as a majority of the people who bother to speak out.

There are a few voices developing on the Left who can match the Right's media voices in wild rhetoric and outlandish accusations (not that I'm saying that's a good thing), but it doesn't seem to come naturally to the Left.

I don't know. People seem to feel that right-wing talk radio needs to be countered, but I'm not sure.

Let's be serious. How many real people listen to that stuff? I mean, sure, granted, there's a core of (searching for polite words here) disgruntled misfits dying to be told that they're really, really special, but outside of them, is anyone who has a mind to think with and the sense to honestly weigh two opinions a regular listener of hate radio?

Okay, now that I've pretty much offended everyone, let me point out that I'm saying "right-wing radio" on purpose. That's so as to distinguish it from "conservative talk radio" which is not hate programming.

Conservative talk radio includes a fair amount of religion. You know. God stuff. I understand there's a lot of programming around that that will please you if you're Protestant.

And then there's the more rational stuff, the political programs with Conservative commentators and the news programs with Conservative biases. These are perfectly acceptable fare and they're quite different from what I mean when I talk about "right-wing radio."

But let's face it, the "reputation" of Conservative talk radio, such as it is, is based on the Right-wing programs. You don't get one without the other because it's the extremist programs that draw in the audiences. Without them, the rest of the Conservative programs aren't likely to be robust enough to support an entire network.

(Side note. Are UsofA citizens so apolitical because they don't care or are they apolitical because the media started telling them they were apolitical, so they quit trying to make an individual difference?)

A couple of conservatives weigh in on the Left's radio network. They avoid discussing right-wing talk radio's more extreme programs, they just say that radio is no place for nuances, you have to be passionate and take an absolute stance. It's a sort of coded way of saying just what I said, but a reputable newspaper isn't going to print your column if you say that hate sells.

Anyhow. I find myself wondering if the bit about nuances being out of place on the airwaves is really true.

After all, we're the "intellectuals" aren't we? Maybe the willingness to consider nuances isn't a drawback? Maybe the Right's experience of listeners mainly interested in simplistic, one-syllable ranting, isn't really applicable to the Left?

Couldn't it be that a more rational, reasonable approach is likely to draw a wider audience, whether "liberal" or "middle of the road" or even "moderate conservative"?

I don't think the "voter base" for each party, as they describe it in the column, is particularly relevant, by the way. There's a bit of apples and oranges going on and in any case, the Left tends to be more individualistic and less inclined to become part of a herd than the Right. (I'm dismissive and condescending today, aren't I?)

And the Left does vote. More people voted for Gore than for Bush in 2000. The DNC's list of donors may have shrunk, but I don't think that means the majority of voters aren't going to be dancing to the Left in November.

Anyhow. To get back to my point and I did sort of have one, I don't know if talk radio will work for the Left. I don't see inexperience or funding as the big problem, either.

I see the big problem being that we need to accept that there are few in power on the Right who are open to compromise or negotiation on the issues we feel most strongly about, so it's time we all stopped asking to sit down at the table together.

It's time the Left, Democrat, Progressive, Green, and the rest of us, came up with its own solutions to these problems and started explaining them…maybe via talk radio…to everyone they can get to listen. It's up to the Left to actually present some viable solutions to what we consider the country's problems.

(The "moderate middle" is bigger than either party but if most of them cared enough to care deeply about anything, they'd be on the Left or the Right, and not in the middle of the road waiting to get run over by an oil tanker.)

Posted by AnneZook at 01:21 PM


Comments

I remain convinced that someone at Air America ought to contact The Firesign Theatre about a regular show. But of course that's just me...

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at March 31, 2004 03:26 PM

Not a bad idea at all. :)

I don't know how much I'll be able to listen to it, since I have to stream it, but I'll certainly be watching progress with interest!

Posted by: Anne at April 1, 2004 08:01 AM