"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 05, 2004
Ethics and Land Mines and Voting and Stuff

Another story of a lapse in journalistic ethics.

I don't think a smarter land mine is really going to fix the objections people have with land mines. As the world becomes ever-more computerized, I foresee ever-more danger that bombs activated by electronic signals could be activated by someone's toaster.

Okay, that's an exaggeration. But there's no way to guarantee accidental activation won't take place, triggered by someone's new security system or by the accidental crossing of electronic signals.

And there's no way to guarantee terrorists won't figure out how to activate someone else's minefield.

Also? Let's not miss the blackmail potential inherent in being able to call someone up and casually inform them that they're sitting on a minefield and if they don't behave in a way that makes me happy, I'll hit the switch. "I" could be a terrorist and I could be a 'legitimate' government, but it's blackmail either way.

What's going on in Slovenia?

Voters in Slovenia have rejected plans to restore rights stripped from ethnic minorities after the country's independence from Yugoslavia.

Around 18,000 people were removed from population records and lost all their residency rights.

Most of them were nationals of other former Yugoslav republics.

That's harsh.

On the other hand, I'm starting to wonder if voting is the best way to decide some issues. (I'm on slippery ground here, I know.)

Initial results from the state electoral commission showed 94% of those who voted rejected the law. Only 4% voted in favour.

That's a pretty sweeping majority, but it's less impressive when you read the next sentence.

Turnout was 31%.

So of the 31% of the population who cared enough about the issue to come out and vote, mostly it was the xenophobia and racists who cared? Are we to assume this is a fair representation of Slovenia's mindset?

Place-holding. It's an odd little story, but I can't honestly say I see anything wrong with the practice. I find it a bit hard to view it (as described) as some of kind proof of the evil power of wealth. I'd find it easier to sympathize with this as proof that we need some serious alterations in the way our government conducts its business, but that wasn't really the point of the article.

William Safire thinks we're all bogged down in ancient history, trying to figure out what happened in 2001, and should relegate those events to the history books alongside FDR and Pearl Harbor. William Safire, as I believe I've said before, can be a bit of a twerp sometimes. (I have no patience with people who don't think how we got where we are matters or with people who think anything more than a month old is ancient history.)

And I'm no military research and spending expert, so I can't tell. Are we spending $300 million a plane for a fleet of jets to meet a need that no longer exists? I'm not immediately convinced by the news that we have "old" planes that can do the job. How well do they do it and as those planes age, what will it cost us to build new ones like them and will they meet future needs or are the planned planes more flexible that way?

Molly Ivins mentions some things that matter to me. Like the lack of attention paid during a campaign to states not "in play." As I'm sure I've mentioned before, I support split electoral votes.

If a state's voters vote 60% for one presidential candidate and 40% for a different presidential candidate, then I think that state's electoral votes should reflect the split. Each makes its own decision about this and I wish Coloradans would give the issue some consideration. (Molly discusses a few other matters as well.)

And, while we're in Texas, say 'howdy' to Kinky Friedman who is planning to run for governor on a platform that's an odd mixture of the admirable and the absurd. Mostly the latter.

Posted by AnneZook at 10:34 AM


Comments