"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 12, 2004
Go ahead. Label me.

I'd be a conservative, if the relevant party in this country wasn't conservative about the wrong things.

That's small 'c' conservative there above you know. The 'resistant to change' sort of conservative. I've always been very conservative.

When I was young, I was conservative.

I grew up in a world where people argued, passionately and convincingly, against war, for equal rights, against the mushrooming military-industrial complex, and in favor of living lives that were about more than having a 9-5 kind of job. It was a world where people explored the potential of non-traditional families, investigated non-traditional careers, and tried to redefine "success."

I'm all about going back to those good old days.

Yeah, there were the other guys, but when Tricky Dick exited stage right, we sort of figured they were a spent force.

And then we got Reagan and Bush I and Bush II.

In the middle, there was Clinton, fighting tooth and nail to keep the Republican machine from subpoenaing the paper clips in his desk and the dust on his carpet and anything else they could think of doing that might prevent the Clinton Administration from focusing on doing the job.

I've come to the conclusion that a large part of the Right's pitbull attack on Clinton was because they were desperate for headlines to bury the frauds and scandals of the Bush and Reagan Administrations. Not to mention Nixon.

They were desperate, I think, to try and convince the public that it wasn't just the Republicans, it was that all politicians were crooks. Browsing the land o'blog, I see that they've pretty firmly convinced the Right that Nixon, Reagan, and Bush weren't anything special when it came to political malfeasance and that inappropriate inquiries into Clinton's sex life were on a part with the Iran-Contra investigations.

Me, I think the Republican leadership should be billed for what they cost the country during the Clinton years. I mean, they're always nattering on about the importance of "productivity" aren't they? What about all of the productive hours they sucked out of the Clinton Administration?

(In case you were wondering, yes, sometimes I do post things like this just to be annoying.)

Posted by AnneZook at 01:49 PM


Comments

It's not just Clinton. Thomas Reeves, on HNN, called JFK "the most scandalous president in history" for his personal failings. Sure, he had mafia contacts, but those were pretty useful at times......

They are really contributing to the eventual rise of a fascistic "non-political" leadership. Deliberately? I don't know. Yet.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at April 12, 2004 02:21 PM

What always stops me in my tracks is the question of whether or not they're really that smart.

Mostly I think, "no" but then sometimes I look at the last 20 years and think, well, maybeso.

Posted by: Anne at April 12, 2004 05:13 PM

You're the second blogger I've read today who considers herself old-school conservative. (I think Roxanne was the other one.) I've always been a liberal/leftist so I guess I haven't changed that much over the years. :)

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at April 12, 2004 06:55 PM

John Kenneth Galbraith, a famous liberal economist who worked in the JFK administration, wrote a book in 1958 called "The Affluent Society." In the introduction to the book he writes, "I am a conservative, I wish to conserve things, and therefore, by a strange quirk of the language, I am called a liberal."

Posted by: Lawrence Krubner at April 14, 2004 11:52 AM

And Lawrence gets the prize. :)

I'd forgotten about the Galbraith book, but I did in fact read it (a long time ago) and I don't doubt the ideas in it are at the root of my version of "conservatism."

Posted by: Anne at April 14, 2004 12:46 PM