"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 29, 2004
Stuff to read

Avedon Carol kindly reposts her article from the defunct DNO at Avedon's Other Weblog. First up: LatinAmericazation of the USA. (Sadly, the comments function on AOW has been disabled, but I do understand why someone whose daily readership numbers in the thousands can't afford to indulge in the extra bandwidth.)

Goodness. Ask people what they can't find on-line, and you get a flood of answers. Many of the complaints seemed to me to be a case of searching in the wrong place. Others were because people believe a search engine should use language the way a person does - intuiting appropriate context, format, and associations. All of which leads me to speculate that the first serious AI development will be in search engines.

Oooo! TalkLeft is discussing enemy combatants and that Supreme Court case. I look forward to expert analysis in the future.

I am appalled. Just appalled. In exactly what way is naming the names of the soldiers killed in Iraq "not in the public interest"? Is it not enough that their families have been denied the support of having the nation honor the returning caskets? Is a simple recitation of names somehow dangerous to democracy?

And it's comforting that soldiers responsible for this kind of abuse are being punished, but where were the commanding officers? Isn't preventing this kind of thing sort of part of their jobs? As Hal tells us, commanding officers are also facing charges. Maybe. That course of action is being "urged" anyhow.

This kind of thing, people is why we should not allow imprisonment without legislative and judicial oversight. No internment camps, no unregulated prisons, no "enemy combatants" not given access to legal representation. Soldiers in a war zone aren't the best judge of what actions are appropriate or otherwise and a few (to be charitable) over-zealous 'interrogations' can and should bring disaster.

"We need common-sense judges who understand our rights were derived from God."

That's Bush, in 2002. And that's not true.

Our rights are the product of hundreds of years of debate and evolution of thought. And the product of blood, sweat, and tears. The man is out of touch with reality, but that's a separate issue. The problem is that believing you're on a mission from God is how bloody crusades and massacres get started. This kind of thinking is dangerous.

Posted by AnneZook at 11:56 AM


Comments

The quote you post from George W. Bush from 2002 is worrisome. Thomas Jefferson I worded things more broadly when he wrote "... that all men are created equal, that they endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights..."

"Creator" is broad enough that an athiest like myself can assume it refers to my parents. "God" is a little too specific.

Posted by: Lawrence Krubner at April 29, 2004 08:08 PM

And, agnostic aesthistic waffler that I am :) I find his insistence on remaking the judiciary to match his version of Judeo-Christianity extremely worrying.

Although part of me is screaming for someone to notice that "activist" judges are presumably A-Okay as long as their activism doesn't lead them into the heresy of liberalism.

I'm far from thinking Bush seriously wants to lead a crusade to impose Christianity on the country, but so many things he says are open to that interpretation that it is, in my opinion, valid to assess the Bush Administration's policies for...let's say "nudges" in the direction of institutionalized fundamentalism.

Posted by: Anne at April 30, 2004 08:43 AM