"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 30, 2004
This is war

Using Abu Ghraib at all was a mistake and as I recall, many bloggers commented on it a year ago.

This was supposed to be a war on terror[ism], not a war of terror.

Using it to essentially continue Husseins' human rights abuses is intolerable. A lot of heads had better roll. Those flag-draped coffins we're not supposed to see deserve better than this as a legacy of their sacrifices. (Caution! Photographs.)

One of the soldiers facing court martial is Army Reserve Staff Sgt. Chip Frederick.

Frederick is charged with maltreatment for allegedly participating in and setting up a photo, and for posing in a photograph by sitting on top of a detainee. He is charged with an indecent act for observing one scene. He is also charged with assault for allegedly striking detainees – and ordering detainees to strike each other.

60 Minutes II talked with him by phone from Baghdad, where he is awaiting court martial.
Frederick told us he will plead not guilty, claiming the way the Army was running the prison led to the abuse of prisoners.

“We had no support, no training whatsoever. And I kept asking my chain of command for certain things...like rules and regulations,” says Frederick. “And it just wasn't happening."

The idea that someone had to specifically tell him and the other soldiers not to torture and humiliate other people is one of the most appalling things I've heard. Especially considering that he was a "corrections officer at a Virginia prison" previously. In what way did he feel he needed additional training?

Maybe the answer is later in the article…the stuff about helping to soften prisoners up for interrogation.

There's something seriously, seriously wrong. Many of us can't conceive of doing something we know, intellectually, morally, in our gut is wrong, but we're not in Iraq, we're not in that situation.

And, as we know, training for soldiers is specifically designed to break down ingrained social barriers.

This is why it's so critical that the Geneva Conventions must be applied to everyone taken prisoner in Iraq and that our Constitutional protections should apply. Soldiers on a battlefield don't have perspective. They're not objective. And, in this and other cases, their commanding officers completely failed to protect the soldiers from the consequences of their training and the situation.

The next time you find yourself wondering why some of us see war as an extremely dangerous, absolutely last resort, remember this incident.

Posted by AnneZook at 09:49 AM


I've read in a couple of places that the people in charge of the prison and the staff had not received Geneva Convention training. I know it was part of basic training in the 1960's, but apparently it is no longer done.

You can't hype people up to "kill the enemy" and then tell them they are prison guards. There are too many people filling jobs that they know nothing about. If they have training and guidence they can complain about procedures, but if they don't know what the military considers "right and wrong" they are cut off from the Inspector General system.

Posted by: Bryan at April 30, 2004 09:58 PM

I should be plain that the people involved belong in prison themselves, but so should those above them for not providing the training and guidence needed.

Posted by: Bryan at April 30, 2004 10:01 PM

I guess I can accept that people need "Geneva Convention" training but my heart and head both have trouble accepting that someone has to be specifically trained that a person locked up and helpless is fair fame for humiliation and torture.

I mean, I have the barest understanding of the training that got the soldiers to that point. I have neither understanding nor sympathy for their commanding officers. They're the ones who should be locked up. If the soldiers can't count on their officers to lead them, then....

Posted by: Anne at May 1, 2004 06:27 AM