"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

May 23, 2004
It's Okay, We're the USA!

Potentially flouting the ban on bioweapons.

Looks like the Bush Administration and their admirers can rest easy on one point. UsofA soldiers can't be tried for war crimes.

I try to keep faith in the fundamental military organization, even after painful, disturbing reading about the abuses. I try to believe they're interested in clearing their reputation, not in a whitewash.

We certainly can't count on any Bush appointees to come clean.

"What has been charged so far is abuse, which I believe technically is different from torture," said Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. "I'm not going to address the `torture' word."

"Technically" different. Well, that's good enough for me. Don't bother to read the rest of the column that discusses the torture methods used for hundreds of years that are probably still being used in Abu Ghraib.

The first story wasn't true, but a new story of torture by U.K. soldiers may be. I was especially appalled by this, toward the end of the article:

In a further blow to the Pentagon, a former US Marine reveals today in the IoS that soldiers in his unit routinely killed innocent civilians and desecrated corpses.

I've had occasion in the past to disagree with The New Republic. Let's see what this week's offering, "written by the editors. has to tell us

We hasten to add what would, in calmer times, be perfectly obvious: The atrocity in that room was greater by many factors of immorality than the atrocity in that prison.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Inflammatory rhetoric can't hide the fundamental flaw in their reasoning. In no times would the murder of a single person be worse than the murder and torture of dozens, if not hundreds of people.

I know I've said this before, but I'm saying it again. I deeply regret the death of Nick Berg, but he walked open-eyed into a war zone.

We took a prison already famed and feared in the country for being the home of atrocities and made it even worse because we pretended we were doing it "in the name of freedom." We arrested people upon no definite charges, sometimes taking them from their homes in the middle of the night, we incarcerated them, and we abused, tortured, and sometimes murdered them.

There is no trick of argument that can, or should, be used to excuse or minimize this.

Indeed, the swift succession of images had the effect, or should have had it, of establishing a sense of proportion about the outrages of the day. The American torture in Abu Ghraib was a violation of American principles, but the jihadist slaughter in the anonymous abattoir was a fulfillment of jihadist principles.

As the increasing information on Abu Ghraib (and other places) makes clear, this torture was government policy at work, not the rogue behavior of a few sadistic soldiers. This was, I guess, the fulfillment of neocon principles. What the NR editors should be warning against is those becoming UsofA principles, not telling us we're over-excited and not thinking clearly.

We have a sense of proportion, guys. We see Abu Ghrain in context, okay? And it stinks.

Also, what kind of idiotic hubris brought them to this:

[...] our authority as the agents of all good things in Iraq has been calamitously damaged.

Our authority? Agents of "all good things"? What planet are they living on?

There's much to agree with in the column, but that one paragraph was an appalling mess.

Lies. If you want to believe something badly enough, you'll believe lies.

But forget all that. Support America. We (sort of) suck the least less than a lot of other places.

Posted by AnneZook at 11:03 AM


Comments