"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 15, 2004
Meeting Break

The wretched excess of marketing material that surrounds us.

Call me crazy, but I think spending two years building a special jail to stuff people awaiting deportation into sends entirely the wrong message. (Or…not. I notice it's in Tacoma. It's the other side of the country from the lady with the lamp and suddenly I have this image of us welcoming people with open arms at one door and then kicking them out the back door when no one is looking. I realize that's not exactly what's happening, but it's the image I get.)

Also, I may be silly, but I doubt that the right way to "reform" unsatisfactory, abuse detention facilities is to build different facilities somewhere else.

We are so on the wrong track in this country.

I also wonder why you never hear any of those people who jump up and down and foam at the mouth about the 'sanctity' of the 'family' protesting that a father doesn't abdicate his right to have a voice in how his children are raised just because he gets a divorce.

Oddly enough, when a father's right to help make decisions about his children is denied purely because of "legal custody" issues, you don't hear those 'family sanctity' people protesting at all.

David Brooks never seems to stray too far from his Conservative roots. His going on about the "elites" and their advanced "education" today.

This year the presidential election is a contest between the rival elites of the educated class.

That's such a typically Conservative view of society, with disdain for "educated" people right there in your face. (One presumes that Brooks himself never quite managed to finish high school or something.)
.
No, seriously, it's an interesting column…but I'll admit I did think of that when I saw the teaser for the column. It would be nice to live in a country where either having an education wasn't seen as "elitist" or where everyone was a member of the 'educated elite,' don't you think?

Posted by AnneZook at 03:44 PM


Comments

"That's such a typically Conservative view of society, with disdain for "educated" people right there in your face."

Whoa. Are you sure you read his column right? He wasn't saying liberals were educated and therefore bad. He said that America has an educated elite and that it is split into rival liberal and conservative factions.

According to the census of 2000 only 14% of American women have college degrees (28% of younger women do) - and those with college degrees lead healthier and more affluent lives. That is clearly an elite. But it is not necessarily a liberal elite, nor did Brooks argue that it was. He recognized that there were lots of conservatives in that elite too. An elite split into rival liberal and conservative factions. But an elite nonetheless.

One thing I admire about the conservative movement, or at least its latest incarnation (the mental space it's been in for the last 20 years), is the way it never forgets how few Americans have college degrees. A lot of my liberal friends, by contrast, tend to think everyone is exactly like them - college educated and looking out at the world as a white collar professional. I love them but I find it a bit obtuse. And it seems a sad transformation for the Democratic party, which once upon a time was the party of the working class.

Posted by: Lawrence Krubner at June 16, 2004 09:03 AM

Like I said, it's what I thought when I first read the 'teaser' for the column is all.

Posted by: Anne at June 16, 2004 09:45 AM

The list of democratic leaning educated people seem to be professions immersed in the service economy as opposed to the republican leaning educated immersed in the industrial economy.

It seems strange that the voice of the "undereducated" are the service economy folks as opposed to the industrial types. Given the pace of job creations overseas in this global economy perhaps having service sided representation is the best choice.

Do you want fries with that opinion?

Posted by: jim at June 17, 2004 09:35 AM

Heh. Heh.

Posted by: Anne at June 18, 2004 11:34 AM