"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 23, 2004
Stop Picking On Ralph?

This whole "bashing Ralph Nader" thing is getting weird. I heard a report about that meeting on NPR last night. They said people were shouting at Nader to stay out of the race.

I don't want a Republican victory in November, but this is a free country, you know. Nader can run for president if he wants to.

People choose their candidates in the polling booth. If they don't choose Kerry, then he just didn't get the job done of convincing them. I don't want to see that happen but that's how the system works.

I mean, yeah, Ralph's delusional, pretending he's going to "split" the Republican vote (if he really believes that) but that doesn't matter. He's entitled to run. (Well, as far as that goes, I guess there's nothing illegal about people shouting at him because they don't want him to run, but it seems a bit obnoxious. If you want people to vote for someone else, get out there and advertise and support the someone else.)

I'm thinking maybe he's been fooled into thinking he has real votes on the Right. I mean, since prominent Republicans have donated to his campaign, he may be fantasizing that they'd actually vote for him and refusing to admit that they're just funding him to make sure he keeps hanging around "spoiling" elections by splitting the votes on the Left.

Let me point out that while such behavior isn't illegal or anything, doing things solely to muddy the electoral process is just wrong. It's unethical and immoral. Underhanded and two-faced. It's just a sneakier way of running a negative campaign.

I think that honest politics is about running on the issues and a candidate's position on them, not just about winning at all costs. Deciding to give financial support to someone just because you think they will siphon votes away from your opponent (or your candidate's opponent) is a long way from showing support for your own beliefs.

And no matter how you pretend otherwise, dirty tricks are dirty tricks. When you're trying to decide who stoops the lowest in "playing politics with the issues," remember this kind of thing.

Posted by AnneZook at 01:31 PM


Not to interfer with the worldview of others, but the problem with the ballot in Florida in 2000 was that there were over a dozen people running for President. That's why the ballot was so difficult, all of them had to crammed on the same page, or Hollerith card in the case of a couple of counties.

There will be a dozen people on the ballot this year, not just Bush, Kerry, and Nader.

Posted by: Bryan at June 23, 2004 06:38 PM

That's true, of course. And in a close race, half a dozen "minor" candates who collectively pull 2% or 3% of one party's votes away from the "main" candidate can swing an election.

Posted by: Anne at June 24, 2004 11:17 AM