"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

August 06, 2004
'Entertainment' Limbo

Another place I'm starting to see a painful division is between what we profess to believe in what we enjoy as "entertainment."

"Superhero" movies I can (just) understand. The appeal to the psyche of a country that more than half-believes we're the superhero good guys of the world is pretty clear.

War movies...well, most of the films that have come out about Vietnam I interpret as our way of dealing with the pain of a time in our recent past when few of us didn't do something to be ashamed of.

Before that, maybe we glorified our "war history" a bit, but I do think those who have been willing to go to war on our behalf are worthy of honor. (I don't always think the leaders were worthy of the same honor, but their role isn't quite the same.)

Sitcoms...well, every society needs comic relief. What we find funny says a lot about our cultures.

Television drama...cop shows and lawyer shows are staples of television "entertainment." I guess it shows a fascination with "the process" but as I understand it (I don't watch them), a feature is the fight for Truth, Justice, and the American Way. Perfectly understandable.

But so-called "reality" television...the appeal of that has always been a mystery to me. I don't understand people glued to television screens watching "real police videos" in hopes they'll see...what? Someone get shot? A little blood? And those "survivor" things, what is the point of watching a bunch of actors pretending to be real people, squabbling through a scripted set of "challenges" and "competitions"? Can't you just watch the Olympics if you want to see people competing physically? (Don't even get me started on the idiocy of those dating shows.) And that "funniest home videos" show was nothing but a humiliation contest. Whoever was the most humiliated won. What does that say about us?

If you can't see the degradation inherent in this concept, then you're just not trying.

Some TV shows offer an extreme makeover, others a bid for pop stardom. But the hottest reality show in the U.S. Hispanic market is offering the ultimate prize -- a potential green card to immigrants desperate to pursue the American dream.

If it turns out that this isn't the usual crop of faked-up "average people" with Equity cards and a string of bit parts in forgettable roles, I may...well, I don't know what I'd do.

This looks more like a cheesy plot to entrap illegal aliens in a bad political thriller than anything else.

How low will television go?

Please note: I am not blogging on company time. Well, I mean, I am, but I'm working. I'm on hold.

Posted by AnneZook at 03:44 PM


Comments

It's interesting that in the 90s we had shows like the X-Files which suggested, over and over again, that the truth was out there but that we, the public, were being kept in the dark. There was some intense paranoia alive and kicking in America in the early and mid-90s, and it showed up in television shows (along with people who honestly thought Clinton was trying to establish a socialist dictatorship).

It strikes me the mood has mutated somewhat, and the reality shows reflect that. There is still the same sense that the truth is somewhere else, and a hunger to be let in on the secret. The reality shows seem to be catering to that. The more "real" shows (like Cops) are informative and spread American values worldwide (you read the bit about the Norwegian kids being arrested by cops in Norway and asking "Aren't you going to read us our rights?" But there were no rights to be read. Because of Cops, the show, the Norwegian kids are more familiar with the American legal system than Norway's.) The more scripted shows, I'm not sure of the appeal.

As to the dating shows - I don't know. I put it down to pathology. Who the hell enjoys this stuff?

Posted by: Lawrence Krubner at August 6, 2004 06:36 PM

I don't know about the dating stuff, but I do remember hearing a bit of a Harlan Ellison interview in which he revealed that his single favorite TV show was People's Court, because of the fundamental reality and naturalness of it.

I'll admit to watching a little bit of the dating shows, in moments of extreme boredom (they can be educational, for those of us who didn't really 'date' in a conventional sense), and I'm one of the only people I know who watched the original "Who wants to marry a millionaire." We watched it because we knew it was a cultural train wreck, not because we expected to enjoy it, and we were right.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at August 7, 2004 01:24 AM

Of course, there is the educational value of the realism. Take, for instance, a documentary like Girls Gone Wild - such an authentic portrayal of American female youth allows us to glean important insights about what it's like to be a woman in America today.


(yes, I'm kidding :-; )

Posted by: Lawrence Krubner at August 7, 2004 10:19 AM

My other hobby (besides blogging) is people watching. I think alot of people enjoy people-watching and reality programs are a way to people-watch without leaving the house. It's not any deeper than that, I don't think.

Posted by: Amanda at August 9, 2004 08:23 AM

Lawrence - Well, that's sort of the point, isn't it? "Reality" TV has about as much in common with "reality" as Gilligan's Island did with being shipwrecked.

Amanda I'm a people-watcher myself, but I'd rather watch people than stagey melodrama. That's just me, of course. YMMV

Posted by: Anne at August 9, 2004 10:59 AM