"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

January 26, 2005
Follow. The. Money.

Your government in action.

You want to know what the Bush Administration cares about?

Funds promised (but not delivered) for tsunami relief: $650,000,000.
Funds allocated to build a new embassy in Iraq, up to: $2,000,000,000,000.

Got that?

The people:    $650,000,000
The building:  $2,000,000,000,000
The reason: There's a lot of oil in Iraq.

Link provided for those of you still delusional enough to think the Bush Administration means well by the people of the world.

I mean...just think of what hundreds of thousands of poverty-level or near-poverty level families could have done with their $1,200 per person contribution to the war. Food. Shelter. Transporation. Health insurance.

Heck, they could even have paid a few of the medical bills caused by the gutting of OSHA over the years. (Bush on OSHA, scroll down, link via Josh Marshall).

And another fun quote:

At nearly $105 billion, total funding for military operations [in Asian nations] in 2005 would be more than 13 times larger than Bush's budget for the Environmental Protection Agency.

Isn't that fun? We have unlimited billions to spend on killing people but not a lot to spend on protecting the world they would have lived on if they hadn't died.

Hey! Maybe that's the Bush Administration's answer to Kyoto? They won't agree to cut corporate emissions...but they're assuming that by removing a few hundred thousand people from the planet and impoverishing millions of others, that "market forces" will consequently reduce emissions? After all, dead people don't drive cars and poor people don't buy as many goods produced from polluting industries and can't pay for heating oil or anything else.

Posted by AnneZook at 10:57 AM


Comments

"Funds allocated to build a new embassy in Iraq, up to: $2,000,000,000,000."

Given that two trillion dollars is the entire U.S. government budget for a year, this seems a tad implausible. Even one hundred times less -- twenty billion dollars -- seems a bit implausible, as I believe no building on planet Earth has ever cost remotely such a figure. The most expensive building ever built is said to be the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank at approximately one billion dollars.

Also, your link doesn't go to any entry, but simply to the the MoJo blog, where a "find" search finds no entry for the word "embassy." (I don't doubt that you read an entry there; it simply would be useful to link to it if you're discussing it, rather then simply linking to an entire blog; I'm rather curious to know more about how one can build a building that costs two trillion dollars, myself.)

Incidentally, the HTML of your blog is written in a way that sizes your comment box in such a way that IE 5.5 completely prevents reaching the bottom where the "post" button is; I had to temporarily switch to another browser on this Pentium 1 to post this.

Posted by: Gary Farber at January 29, 2005 07:29 PM