"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 15, 2005
Our World

The army we have.

The diplomacy we pursue.

The contractors we hire.

The politics we've developed.

The government we elected.

The jobs we lost.

The loopholes we leave.

We need a better way. We need to think about some things.

The struggle we face.

The country we want.

The ideals we stand for.

The history we should remember.

Posted by AnneZook at 01:11 PM


Comments

Poetry. Sheer poetry. Thank you.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at March 15, 2005 02:59 PM


The Army we have. Oh, c'mon Anne.

There are so many issues with this one anecdotal story - to include there was actually nothing wrong with the guy except stress..and as a major in a transportation unit, this guy wasn't the one lifting cargo. Also, under the one Army concept, Reserve/Guard soldiers have the same fitness expectations as their active duty counterparts. Of course, since most don't serve "full time" until mobilized, there is more onus on the individual.

This problem was recognized after the problems associated with mobilizing reservists (both Reserve and national guard) in support of Desert Shield/Storm in 90-91. When reservists were mobilized during the Persian Gulf War in 1990-1991, the Army discovered that due to medical reasons or poor dental status a significant number of them could not be deployed or had their deployment
delayed. In an effort to obviate similar problems, Congress passed four statutory requirements to monitor the health status of those designated as early-deploying reservists. These requirements are in
addition to two requirements that had been in place prior to the Persian Gulf War. To meet these requirements, the Army is to provide annual medical screenings, annual dental screenings, selected dental treatment,
and for those over age 40, physical examinations every 2 years. Early-
deploying reservists are required to disclose annually to the Army the status of their physical and dental condition, and those under age 40 are required to undergo a physical examination once every 5 years. The physical includes EKG, lab work, etc.

Since Vietnam, the military (especially the Army under the Abrams doctrine) has made it a point to rely on the reserves for extended campaigns and in some cases, specialty skills for most operations. Given our long standing history of fear of large standing armies (justifiable in my view), this doctrine ensured extended use of the military by the executive branch would force to a degree nationwide interest and get pressure on state and congressional leaders to scrutinize any extended use of the military.

The record of the Clinton administration in this area was terrible. Little action was done to supervise and enforce the requirements in the reserves at the senior level and even worse, the address the appropriate mix of specialities and skills between the active and reserve components, especially when the administration was drawing done the size of the Army. The Bush administration too had a hint of the problems after the mobilizations following 9/11 in support of Noble Eagle (Homeland defense mobilizations).

Specifically though, leadership is the most important element of combat power. The young officer/NCO is the most important element in mission accomplishment. Period. They ensure standards and discipline are enforced and that the job is done to standard. Their enforcement of standards and discipline keep their soldiers alive.

Unit rotations are known in well in advance to allow for training and preparation. Shame on the guy in the article if he wasn't wearing his body armor or weight bearing equipment before he deployed to get used to it - and ensuring the others in his unit were doing the same - especially if he had a "desk job" - note: I've been in a desk job for several years now and don't do organized unit PT - but still find time to exercise and march with my rucksack because it's part of what being a Soldier is about.

The healthier a soldier is the better chance he has of surviving a wound or avoiding the numerous illnesses. Good hard physical training is an important factor. Letting that slip, especially when your unit is in the reserves and you don't have as frequent contact with your soldiers, is an easy trap to fall into - fortunately, when you look carefully at the evacuation numbers in proportion to the overall numbers and given the climate, operational tempo, and challenges in the area of operations, we actually have a significant pool of great leaders who are doing a tremendous job in taking care of their soldiers and accomplishing difficult missions.

The Army we have - best in the world- and one the country should be proud of - which I think is reflected in most opinion polls when folks are asked about their confidence in various institutions..

Posted by: Col Steve at March 16, 2005 12:05 PM

Col Steve -

Seriously, I don't post these things to annoy you. I really don't.

On the other hand, every time I annoy you, I learn an awful lot. :) If I can't get you to start your own blog, then annoying you in mine seems to be the fastest way to get you to talk!

Posted by: Anne at March 16, 2005 02:47 PM

Anne - no annoyance taken - you get me to read things I might not normally read!

Politics: Bolton nomination. Go back and look at the history of UN Ambassadors who have taken a tough, sometimes adversarial approach to the UN (Moynihan - "do battle for the Lord." or Kirkpatrick as examples). Recall Britain's UN representative Ivor Richard chastised Moynihan for 'cowboy behavior' and practicing the diplomacy of a 'Wyatt Earp.'"

Don't think Ms. Ivins wants us to recall that nomination though in her criticism that our European friends might take offense to Bolton's nomination.

We tried the forge a consensus apprpach under Albright and Holbrooke..even Danforth. What is your opinion of the record of the UN? I don't think Bolton is another Moynihan, but sending someone willing to be a little adversarial and challenge the organization might be just what is needed. And I suspect if a little Bolton rubs off on the UN, a little of the good things and promise of the UN might rub off on Bolton.


Posted by: Col Steve at March 18, 2005 12:11 AM