"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 16, 2005
Lunch Break (30 minutes)

I think some people need to have the concept of reasonable doubt explained to them before they direct the state to commit murder.

I found a hint about where to invest my retirement funds.

Stocks of publicly traded companies on Fortune's annual list of "100 best places to work" collectively beat the broader market by more than 300 percent over a seven-year span, according to a new study.

I'm disappointed in the Universal Press Syndicate. If for no other reason than to keep their name from being associated with wingnut bigotry, they should have pursued the copyright problem.

And speaking of racism. Or maybe it's not, I don't know, but the lack of diversity in positions of influence in the Federal government is sad.

The NPR report I heard about mercury poisoning in children differed from this one in at least one significant way. It said that the most common source of mercury poisoning in children is in the fish they eat, or the fish their mothers eat while carrying them. And that that fish is usually one of the less-expensive "deep sea" varieties. Ever since I heard that, I've been waiting for someone to think about it and to point out that if deep sea fish are that polluted, we're likely on the verge of having waited too long to take some real action about environmental pollution.

The Navy protested torture at Guantanamo Bay in 2002. (And a real danger exists in that pursuing investigations of torture allegations may result in perceived "persecution" of ordinary soldiers. Of course, that wouldn't be possible if the higher-ups weren't all running for the hills, but still.)

No, I'm not advocating we drop the investigation, low-level as it is. Not do I, thanks to Andrew, underestimate how serious the "administration" punishments are for the soldiers involved. I just doubt that an Administration intent on covering up having (at least tacitly) encouraged torture is going to give up any significant principal. And I really wonder if any serious investigation will be sponsored in Congress.

There are hints and rumors and suggestions that it's all the CIA's fault. Well, why not? According to some, the CIA has been a whipping boy for "hawks" for a long time. I guess they don't recommend war often enough or something. I don't know who's lying, but I know the Bush Administration created their own "intelligence" department when they didn't like what they were hearing on Iraq, which is very suggestive....

No link, but it's good to know that the $250 tax deduction for K-12 educators who have to buy some of their own classroom supplies is remaining intact here in Colorado. I mean, it would be a shame if educators couldn’t afford to buy their own supplies and We, the Taxpayers started have to fund them, wouldn't it?

Federal Judicial nominees. The fight isn't over. I understand the potential consequences, but I didn't understand how much damage Republicans really are willing to do to the system in order to get their own way. This is appalling...and all the more so because party pressure, as we all know, is forcing some Republicans into line over this when they really don't approve of the nominees.

I support a "smoking ban" in restaurants, etc., but not all of this article made sense to me.

"The banning of smoking is inevitable city by city, and that creates inequities," said Denver restaurant consultant John Imbergamo of The Imbergamo Group. "Whereas, a statewide ban creates a level playing field for everyone."

That's just gibberish. Who are they leveling the playing field for? The places with or without smoking bans?

Who suffers if City A has a smoking ban and City B doesn't? Because if City B suffers because they don't have a smoking ban, they can just enact one, right?

So...logically it seems they must be saying that City A has a smoking ban and no one wants to eat/drink/whatever there because of it? One wonders why they enacted such a ban. (I do support smoke-free areas, especially restaurants. But the bar thing has always struck me as odd. Seriously. I have to think that if there was that much call for smoke-free bars, there would be smoke-free bars. But I know too many people who smoke only when they drink to believe there's really that much call for it. Seems to me that what's at stake here is the right of some people to poison their livers without poisoning their lungs, too.) (Okay, maybe I should take that back. I'm having a bad day.)

Headline of the Day: Democracy is more than a soundbite

Posted by AnneZook at 04:16 PM