"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 22, 2005
I Know You Already Saw This

But just in case....

Billmon, over at the Whiskey Bar on invading Iraq. And don't miss his link to his 2003 entry, Geography Is Destiny.

(As far as that goes, the imagery in these two pictures is worth contemplating.)

The So-Called Liberal Media myth takes another hit with this exposure of CNN's attempt to create conflict where none exists. (Thanks to CanadianCynic.)

If you missed the EditorandPublisher discussion of the comments of reporters who were in Iraq during the "war" then you should remedy that.

A sample of quotes (not chosen for sensationalism):

“In general, coverage downplayed civilian casulaites and promoted a pro-U.S. viewpoint. No U.S. media showed abuses by U.S. military carried out on regular basis.”

Color me so surprised.

“The bombing of civilian areas around Iraq.”

Probably only those of us who get our news from a variety of international sources had any idea how common this was.

“The human cost of the war has been routinely omitted from most U.S. broadcasts. The American people has definitely not gotten the entire picture of the war's devastation and the infernal conditions in Iraq today as a result of the our invasion.”
“We have heard, second-hand, that our corporate president has told producers to keep Iraq war coverage ‘positive.’"

I'm sure this happened in some (but not all) organization.

To my mind, the most telling quote:

“Our news organization failed to subject the administration’s various allegations to sufficient scrutiny and continues to do so. I believe this is primarily because it reflects -- and does not challenge -- the positions of those in power. The absence of opposition from elected officials in Washington created a vacuum and our organization, like many others, completely failed in its responsibility to challenge the assertions of the White House. (Emphasis: mine)

What they have to say is worth considering. It's not just Iraq (as I've said over and over), it's about war. As long as the vast majority of our population doesn't really understand what the words "war zone" actually mean, this will persist.

On the other hand, if it's Iraq we're talking about, certainly the debate about whether or not the media has been covering for the Bush Administration continues.

The U.K., although fighting with us, offered more honest coverage to their citizens.

And, while I'm already annoying some people: From Abu Ghraib to promotion.

I look forward to the USofA's media coverage of the proposed changes at the U.N. A headline we probably won't see much here? US can't go it alone.

I close (but do not slam) the door in the face of people who disturb my day trying to pitch me on joining them in superstition. At the same time, I accept that face-to-face conversation is the single best way to convert anyone from one position to another. (I especially agree with this article. The answer is not for the Left to change what it believes. It's to explain what it believes. " What profit a party if it gain a majority and lose its soul?")

Posted by AnneZook at 09:54 PM