"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 23, 2005
Additional Annoyances

My thought? Any trip a politician takes that's funded by taxpayers dollars should be open to all of us.

If Bush wants to take trips where he won't let Democrats and other non-supporters attend, he can let the Republican party fund those trips.

And the anonymous source gets a little slapping around. I understand occasionally using anonymous sources, but the one quoted in this exchange is (a) pointless in its anonymity (i.e., there's nothing said that requires anonymity); and, (b) gag-inducing.

And, speaking of pointless anonymity, I found the same rant here.

I wrote in my March 18 column about a meeting of journalists at which there was a great deal of consternation expressed about "those maddening White House briefings where a senior administration official stands in front of an auditorium full of reporters, says nothing remotely controversial, and yet insists on being cloaked in anonymity."

That portion of the column is an illustration of how the USofA press continues to allow the White House to make monkeys of the media and I, myself, continue to insist that if the media in this country was honestly interested in being an independent force, they'd band together and refuse to put up with such treatment. (Of course, in my world, the press isn't quite as obsessed with sensationalism and controversy as the real media is, and is more interested in news than flashy headlines.)

And, speaking of media failings, let us consider that whole story around government agencies producing propaganda videos that are then aired as "news." ("Propaganda" may be a bit much. It's possible for such pieces to be purely informational and they have been, in the past.)

Anyhow, the point is that I do think much of the coverage of this issue is missing the point. It's not that the government, under the Bush Administration is producing propaganda and sending it out. Much as I object to having my tax dollars wasted on such junk when things that we need to do are being starved of funding, the bottom line is that they can't make the news media air the stuff without identifying it as having been funded by the government, you know.

The real problem lies there...in the news organizations that gratefully accept these freebies to fill expensive air-time and then don't tell us where they got them. It would do the government no good to make propaganda if they couldn't get it on the air, and they wouldn't do it.

So, yeah, the government is demonstrating a notable lack of ethical standards (which, under this Administration, surprises me not at all) but they have an active co-conspirator in the media.

"Intelligence" information extracted with torture isn't especially useful. Well, duh.

It's good to criticize authority. Even if you're part of the system, and especially if it's your job. Of course, sometimes there's a price to pay.

And, speaking of paying. CEO pay? Not linked to corporate profits.

And, speaking of profits. How many of us got that CAP e-mail about Democratic lawmakers voting for the "Bankruptcy bill" after profiting heavily from campaign donations from the very credit card companies that stand to profit most from the bill itself?

Looks like Podesta is in trouble over sending it out.

Nearly every lawmaker who arrived at Thursday’s meeting with Podesta, former President Clinton’s last chief of staff, voiced concern about the Sirota broadside, calling it overtly personal and unhelpful to the two organizations’ shared goal of helping the Democratic Party grow.

I'm thinking that what those lawmakers fail to understand is that we don't want to "grow" with the likes of them in our ranks. They're either liberals or they aren't...and too much of the Democratic Party falls into the "aren't" category any more.

I'm just saying. If they want to live off corporate pork, they can become Republicans.

295,000. Is that a big number or a little one?

In terms of the budget deficit, it's tiny.

As a death toll, it was astonomical. My mind boggles, not only at that, but at the global response (some of which, as we know, is only "pledged" and won't all be delivered.)

Still. As far as people reaching out to offer Tsunami relief. Looks like we done good. So far.

(For the record, and because I spend a certain amount of time dissing the USofA pharmaceutical industry, I read a report (subscription) today saying:

As of January 12, 2005, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America reported that $90 million in cash, medicine, and services had been contributed by America's pharmeceuticval companies to the global relief effort for tsunami-hit Asia and Africa.

Contributions included medicines, vaccines, bandages, baby formula, cash money, and water-purifaction packets. So, go them.

After that, we turn our attention South, to a community searching for a sustainable lifestyle that allows them, and their neighbors, to coexist in peace:

Within minutes, seawater roiled in a fury of bubbles. A gray shadow came into view, inches beneath the surface. It stretched twice as long as the boat, too close to make sense of the shape. The boatman, hand on the tiller, looked nervous. He popped the outboard into reverse and began to back away.

Whomp! The bow of the dory swung wildly. The barnacled snout of a gray whale surfaced. The whale began to turn, belly up, and slipped under the boat. The dory was filled with the sound of rubbery flesh squeaking against the fiberglass hull.

"It's Valentina," Lopez said, explaining that the whale got her nickname when she showed up last year on Valentine's Day.

One flipper, raised about 4 feet out of the water, came along one side of the boat. Another flipper came along the opposite side. Gently cradling the dory between her flippers, Valentina lifted it slightly out of the water. Passengers grabbed for the rails.

"It's a whale hug," Lopez said. "Forty tons of love."

Swimming on her back with the dory balanced on her broad chest, Valentina took passengers for a short ride. Some squealed with delight, while others sat silently in awe.

Save the Whales.

Posted by AnneZook at 06:20 PM


Comments