"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 30, 2005
Now It's Wednesday


It's policy.

And the reports just keep on coming.

Antiquated laws

North Carolina's "anti-cohabitation law" loses a woman her job. A 200 year-old law, dredged up, dusted off, and waved in someone's face.

I guess the question is...do you really want your tax dollars being spent to enforce someone's personal morality? (Yes, it's a law, but a law that isn't enforced equally across the population is a tool of repression. And it needs to be repealed, anyhow.)


The Asia Times thinks Iran should be worried about the USofA's continuing push to set up military bases all around it. (We have our usual poor-quality "intelligence" on what's actually going on in the rest of the Bush Axis O'Enemies.)

I noticed what it said about still-chaotic Afghanistan:

One thing that is certainly not under control, and is surely the source of many threats to the region, is opium production. During the US occupation, opium production grew at a much faster rate than Washington's, and Karzai's, enemies weakened. In 2003, US-occupied Afghanistan produced 4,200 tons of opium. In 2004, US-occupied and semi-democratic Afghanistan produced a record 4,950 tons, breaking the all-time high of 4,600 tons produced under the Taliban in the year 2000.

Though the problem is known to the world, the Pentagon refuses to deal with it. It is not the military's job to eradicate poppy fields, says the Pentagon. Indeed, it would antagonize the warlords who remain the mainstays of the Pentagon in Afghanistan, say observers.

Maybe if we hadn't been in such a screaming hurry to run away from what we started in Afghanistan, so we could free up soldiers to invade a non-aggressive country, we wouldn't now be allied with drug-smuggling, war-mongering radicals in Afghanistan, you know?


Do you know where your tax dollars go?

(Note the caveat in the article. These are estimates. The Pentagon is notoriously reluctant to share actual allocations for expenditures, partly because of the money they funnel into little-advertised "intelligence" projects and partly because keeping track of where you spend hundreds of billions of dollars every years is not a small project.) (I'm not entirely faulting them for this. On Monday, I had $82. Today I have $47. I bought lunch for $10. I gave $3 to homeless people. I have no idea where the rest of it went.)

(Note: It's been mentioned in the comments that the DoD funds quite a bit of health-related research. This is true, although the dollar amount is not large when compared to the overall Pentagon budget.

Also, I feel absolutely compelled to mention that the DoD doesn't undertake this research out of altruism but because they have tens of thousands of soldiers with health problems, from PTSD to bullet or bomb wounds to diabetes to cancer to everything else. Also that the DoD isn't doing anything that wouldn't be done by other health-care research organizations if those organizations were given the money the DoD is given.

And, having said, that, let me add a disclaimer that I've worked, briefly, with a number of DoD health-care offices and VA hospitals and have never encountered anyone who was not hard-working, dedicated, and truly committed to providing value for investment and the best possible care to their patient populations. The "DoD" I'm discussing is the faceless entity, the budgetary umbrella penciled in for $513B in the next budget.)

I refuse to get all wound up about the $345.8B budgeted for health care. First, I'd much rather spend billions on medicine than missiles. Second, I refuse to get mad again about the pharmaceutical company give-away that the new Medicare "prescription drug benefit" became. At least, not at this moment. I have other things to be mad about today.

The fuller .pdf discussion is really interesting, not the least because it behooves us all to know where our money goes.

It's our money. Our tax dollars. We need to keep an eye on where it goes.

There will be a brief pause while you all give thanks that I chose not to insert a lengthy rant about how the Republican party provides imitation Secret Service muscle to keep taxpayers out of taxpayer funded gatherings.

If it were me, and I were attending such a function, now that I know this, I'd refuse to be removed. A public event, funded by my tax dollars, and me not creating any kind of disturbance? You'd better believe I'd refuse to leave. And then I'd sue. I am not, by nature, "actively" radical, but the idea that we have a president too fragile to hear a dissenting opinion really disturbs me.

Okay, a short rant. But not a lengthy one.

I had a lot more I wanted to talk about today, but it's time to share some of my time with the folks who pay me.

Later, we'll be considering bananas.

Posted by AnneZook at 12:24 PM


It just keeps getting weirder.

Posted by: Kat at March 30, 2005 01:31 PM