"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 01, 2005
Elsewhere

Even MoJo misses the point. Everyone misses the point. The most serious problem isn't that the government produces propaganda pieces. It's the MSM's choice to run these pieces without identifying them as such.

I've been watching the turmoil in academia for a while now so I knew the graduate student union idea was out there. It will be interesting to see how this develops. Another discussion here.

And while "zero-tolerance" sounds like a good idea, no policy that's implemented without the application of common sense is a good one.

A list of headlines:

U.S. Soldier Convicted of Killing Iraqi Walks Free

U.S. Intelligence 'Dead Wrong' on Iraq-Report

U.S. Soldiers Arrested for Colombian Cocaine Plot

U.S. Forces Hold Suspected U.S. Insurgent in Iraq

Uncle Sam doesn't look like one of the good guys today, does he?

Also, U.S Government-created "independent" research group under contract to Pentagon says post-war planning failures are the Pentagon's. I don't know that I agree with that. If the president decides to go to war, surely he and his staff have some kind of responsibility to outline and personally approve any post-war "reconstruction" efforts? I have issues with the military being the catch-all for all of our foreign affairs, okay? They're the soldiers. They shoot people and drop bombs. I think nation-building should be handled by someone else. That sounds bad, but I can't think of a different wording. What I mean is that we're asking far too much of the military. They have too many missions, too many of which are mutually incompatible.

The last time I sneezed, analysts were watching breathlessly to see if oil was going to hit a record-setting $50/barrel. Today, a breath later, news of oil topping $56/barrel doesn't even rate major headlines.

What about if it hits $105/barrel? (Via Andrew Tobias.)

(Via the same column, remember we're boycotting Nevis now.)

Has the USofA crossed the Rubicon in foreign policy?

Okay, moving on, much about this American Prospect article on aid for college students strikes me as dishonest. The article mixes "scholarship" money with tuition aid, but these aren't even remotely the same thing. Scholarship money is awarded to, well, scholars. People who excel academically.

For those who need tuition assistance, there's a different pile o'money. Admittedly that pile has shrunk, partly thanks to the Bush Administration who would prefer the non-wealthy skipped college and got right to serving burgers, but to say that "scholarships" shouldn't be given to the best "scholars" is just ridiculous.

There's also a level of condescension in "kids from wealthier families who don't need scholarship aid but score well in standardized tests" that I find amazingly offensive. What are we saying, here? That poor children who get good grades are worthy of all support but that having money in the family turns a child from a scholar to a selfish free-loader?

Also, I doubt that colleges are able to "transfer" money to "academic superstars" since grant/aid money and scholarship money are usually regulated by different sets of standards, but if they are, can we please not diss universities for wanting to offer higher education opportunities to those who have worked for the opportunity, regardless of family finances?

Do we need to make it financially feasible for qualified applicants to attend college, regardless of family financial situation? Yes.

Is there any point in slapping around the children of the families most likely to donate alumni funds and/or help fund endowments and financial aid funds? No.

There are days...not many, but there are days when I almost suspect that the accusations of the Left's contempt for money are quite true.

Sheesh. I don't often disagree with TAP, but this article really offended me.

(Disclosure: I was not awarded any scholarship during my university years.)

To counteract that, the criminal cheeseburger affair! (WMA sound file available.)

I'm afraid I don't have anything funny to post to celebrate the April 1 Foolery. I tend to be foolish at random intervals throughout the year. Mostly, after the week I've had, I'm just looking forward to going home and cleaning out a closet. Whenver my work life gets out of control, I organize something at home to within an inch of its life, and vice-versa.

Posted by AnneZook at 03:15 PM


Comments