"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

May 31, 2005
Impeachment
Article II, Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

New articles are out by Ralph Nader and Kevin Zeese and Norman Solomon.

Believe it or not, I was contemplating the topic before I saw these headlines. And now, before I even read them, let me tell you where my thoughts were going.

The move to impeach Clinton was a childish and petulant gesture that cost this country dearly. (Yes, he told a lie about having sex. His non-criminal, if immoral, sex life is not Congress's responsibility and the matter should never have been the subject of any investigation.)

It's already been revealed that a major facet in the decision to try and impeach Clinton was "revenge" for the impeachment of Nixon.

This worries me for a lot of reasons.

First, are we to understand that the Republican leadership didn't think Nixon's behavior should be punished?

What else are we to understand? That Republicans in Washington think criminal behavior by the (Republican) President of the United States was just, I don't know, business as usual? Are we to infer that they don't find this kind of thing to be a problem? Exactly how much of this stuff is going on in Washington, anyhow? Just exactly how corrupt has the system become?

Second, is this why there was no move to impeach Reagan for the criminality of the Iran-Contra affair? Were Washington Republicans shielding the Reagan Administration, even in the face of revelations of even more serious crimes than the Nixon Administration committed, out of some insane partisanship?

So...now we're at GWBush and there's a move afoot to impeach him for lying us into an illegal and immoral war. As far as that goes, I support the move, even if we won't succeed and we all know it. No Republican-dominated Congress is going to impeach a Republican President. (At least not without a heckuva lot of screaming from the so far apathetic majority.)

I think the Bush Administration was determined to invade Iraq on any pretense they could find. There's mounting evidence to support this. They were determined to wage an aggressive war to secure for our country an undue influence on the distribution of Iraq's all-important oil (and not incidentally to enrich their billionaire friends and campaign donors even further). (//digression// Every gallon you pump into your tanks from now on is going to be stained with the blood of Iraq's people. Unless you join the BUY-cott. //end digression//)

But I also wonder what this all means for our future? Is the next Democratic president going to be facing impeachment on any charges a group of infuriated neocons can drum up? (Or maybe on some real charge, because I begin to wonder just how many politicians' careers could stand close scrutiny.)

Are we to be faced with a succession of years'-long investigations that eat up tens of millions of dollars each and waste time our elected officials should be spending on governing, in a never-ending cycle of vengeance and payback?

I'm sure we'd all like to think of our elected officials as men and women of stature and gravitas. 'Tain't so.

At the very least, we'd like to think of them as grown-ups. Sadly, the Bush Administration acts more like a gang of playground bullies, which leaves me wondering...are they a trend, or an anomaly?

And now, to read the above-referenced articles....

Posted by AnneZook at 06:47 PM


Comments

It's not like you have to work hard at it: he's violated the plain text of the Constitution, in addition to fraud and deception well beyond that which Clinton perpetrated in importance.

The failure of Congress to even debate impeachment, coupled with the judicial merry-go-round (am I the only person who got a little motion-sick at the constant repetition of "up or down" "up or down" "up or down"?) concept of "advice and consent" and any doubts I had about the Imperial Presidency are pretty much gone.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at June 1, 2005 12:28 AM

And if you're serious, there's a blogger alliance we can join.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at June 1, 2005 05:14 AM

I share your motion-sickness.

I also got a bit queasy watching the Right rewriter history to pretend they never filibustered.

I joined the BBA a couple of days ago, although I have yet to make my post.

Posted by: Anne at June 1, 2005 08:18 AM