"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 08, 2005
Religious Freedom

Okay, it's Canada, but I think many of the same issues being raised there are those that we face here in the USofA.

I think our Northern neighbor is letting itself be buffaloed by homophobic churches.

The Liberal government moved yesterday to prevent an internal crisis over its bill to legalize same-sex marriage, saying it is willing to beef up protections for church groups complaining that their religious freedoms will be violated.

It's absurd to say that same-sex marriage violates someone's religious freedom. If they disapprove, they're entitled to disapprove.

What they don't have the right to do is to tell the rest of the world it can't approve of same-sex marriage.

I was talking with someone about this just last night. The problem is that some people interpret their "freedom" as the freedom to dictate to other people. Wrong.

Your "religious freedom" stops at the door of your church.

A Justice official said the government will give "serious consideration" to an amendment that would assure churches will not lose their charitable status for refusing to perform gay marriages.

I support this. (Except for the part where I don't see any reason a "church" should be tax-exempt.) A church that's homophobic shouldn't have to perform same-sex marriages. Also, a church that's racist shouldn't have to let in people from other than their preferred ethnicity. Or to perform marriage ceremonies for couples of different races. A church that's misogynistic shouldn't have to let women worship.

That's not sarcasm. I'm serious.

Okay, I think it's all a lot of superstition anyhow, but I also think everyone is entitled to their hobby. I don't really think it matters what they do, and if they decide to redefine "religion" to mean "biased against women" or "celebrating left-handed people" or whatever other idiocy they come up with, I can't really see that it matters. Let them pay their taxes and believe whatever insanity they want to believe in private.

Even more than that, though, I think there are many advantages to providing complete religious freedom.

For one thing, the bigots, misogynists, racists, and homophobes would be self-identified. I'm sure you can all see the good of that.

Face it...if you remove the tax-breaks "churches" get, does it really matter how someone defines their particular brand of superstition?

It's not like pretending the bigotry doesn't exist erases it. Maybe a little of the harsh light of day on the shadow will help dispell it?


(With apologies, in advance, to those who don't deserve the scorn I'm heaping on the bigoted and narrow-minded among the "religious" crowd.)

Posted by AnneZook at 06:32 PM


Well done, Anne. (By the way, you may wish to consider switching your site feed to full instead of partial. I've tried on a number of occasions to click on your blog to read the rest of your posts, only to be met with error messages.)

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at June 8, 2005 08:47 PM

Thanks, Elayne.

And I'd totally make that switch...if I'd understood a single word of what you said. Can you dumb it down some?

Posted by: Anne at June 8, 2005 09:41 PM