"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 09, 2005
10 Questions - 3 (Nukes)
3. Non-Proliferation: What would you really do differently on non-proliferation? Your criticisms center on process more than substance, and its not clear that Bill Clinton’s policies were any more effective than Bush’s. Do you really believe treaties are the answer, and that verification can protect us against dangerous cheaters? You keep saying non-pro's a top priority for you, but how exactly – in a broad sense – would your approach depart from that of the Bush Administration?

Non-proliferation, huh? Tough one. I support it. I don't know how to do it.

My first step of substance would be to actually start disposing of our ridiculously bloated stockpile of nuclear weapons. And to stop research, now, on all the new kinds of nukes we're exploring.

Then I'd meet the other nuclear nations at the table to honestly discuss our options. Lead by example. (To be honest, I don't know if this dangerous spiral can be stopped, but I think it's worth trying.)

(Speaking of hypocrisy.... Telling most of the world that nukes are evil and will stunt your growth, while we openly explore more and newer nuclear weapons...that's world-class hypocrisy.)

Nuclear weapons are difficult to build. They're expensive. They're dangerous. How many countries would be diverting that kind of money from their economies if they weren't looking at the proliferation of all kinds of weapons all around them?

There's no "off" button on an arms race. No finishing line. The Soviet Union fell and we didn't stop producing bullets and bombs. We just found other countries to use them on.

We need to back the world down, not only from the nuclear race, but from the arms race in general. (The world spent over a trillion dollars on arms in 2004 Does that strike anyone but me as mind-boggling? )

It's not actually necessary to have enough bullets and bombs to kill your adversaries fifty times over in order to survive in the world.

Posted by AnneZook at 02:14 PM


Comments

This seems to me a subject that Bush will go out of his way to avoid discussing, if only so that he doesn't have to struggle to pronounce "nuclear non-proliferation."

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at June 10, 2005 06:55 PM

ROFL! I hadn't thought of that.

Posted by: Anne at June 11, 2005 10:33 AM