"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 27, 2005
Our Mess

Rumsfeld Rejects Outside Panel on Gitmo I've been seeing that headline for the last 24 hours. All I can say is that if they're not doing anything they don't want to the world to know about, there's no reason to resist an independent investigation.

The ballooning number of detainees they're going to want to torture interrogate may have something to do with their reluctance. They don't want investigators showing up unexpectedly, or on-site all the time. It's better to have a chance to clean things up before visitors appear.

So, the "insurgency" could last for as long as 12 more years? That's what's all over the news. Some suggest that the USofA's plan to build 14 permanent military bases in Iraq may be part of the problem.

The Progress Report asks, "Why Is Rumsfeld Still Around?" The simple answer is, because he's doing what 'they' want him to do. Face it, people, ditching Rumsfeld and putting in someone else won't make any difference. It's the policies that are wrong and while Rumsfeld is one of the 'architects' of the policies, he's not a one-man show. The entire Administration will have to go before we can clean up Iraq.

I think it's pretty clear that they intend to leave that little problem for the next Administration. Cleaning up our mess, I mean. By saying it could take twelve more years to quell the violence, Rumsfeld not only absolves the Bush Administration of any expectations of success, but potentially another neocon Administration, if this group can pull that off again.

I should address this but it makes me tired to think about going through all of that again.

I wanted to point you to this. Where is the public outcry, the pressure on Bush to say, clearly and simply, that torture is unacceptable and must stop? (That isn't really what he said here, is it?) Durbin should not have apologized.

I know it's not that simple, but if the Bush Administration wasn't a pig-headed mob of warmongers, we might be able to salvage something out of this mess.

Posted by AnneZook at 07:18 AM


Comments

I don't think the public outcry is missing. I just think the public outcry doesn't make it into the state-controlled media.

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at June 27, 2005 01:43 PM

I'd tend to agree with Elayne: the blogospheric reaction and letters to editors, etc., seem to me to be pretty consistently opposed to the idea of torture (except that small and vocal core who're really, really in favor of it) and us as torturers. The stories keep coming out: even though they contain disclaimers and there isn't any accountability yet (I never really understood the value of divided government until this decade), but the flow continues.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at June 27, 2005 06:19 PM

I know there's outcry that's not making it into the media, but we all have to remember that the media is a business. If there was enough outcry, they'd publish it because they'd know most people were interested. They'll publish whatever they think people will buy papers to read.

Besides...what I'm seeing in most of the MSM is coverage of the story, not outrage. The people I talk to (not on blogs) mostly agree that torture is wrong, but they're so...so offhand about it.

"No, we shouldn't be doing that." "Someone should do something about that."

There's still the sense that Washington and all its doings are something remote, not something that matters in people's "real lives." The sort of people who sign petitions would sign a petition, but every one else just shrugs, even when it makes them angry, and moves on.

Posted by: Anne at June 28, 2005 08:30 AM

We'll see. My very own congressional rep (Case, D-HI) got a dog-and-pony show at Gitmo and announced that everything was fine, no evidence of torture, and everyone there deserved to be there. Dangerous sorts, all.... He's relatively new, but this takes naive and shallow (or grasping and kowtowing, I'm not sure) to new lows.

We'll see if my letter makes the local paper, but at least I cc'd Case on it.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at June 29, 2005 05:27 AM

Of course he did, Jonathan. And I don't doubt that he reported on exactly what he saw.

Given enough notice before such an inspection, how can anyone believe that things weren't going to be peachy-keen?

In the end, what's hurting us the most is the publicity that the USofA is torturing helpless people who have not been convicted, or even charged, with any crime. The only way to solve that is to allow the U.N., Amnesty International, and the Red Cross, reputable international bodies, free and unscheduled access to the entire facility.

If we didn't have anything to hide, there wouldn't be any reason why we couldn't allow unannounced and thorough inspections.

The Bush Administration could give every prisoner a Barca-lounger, an ice-cream soda, and a gold-bound copy of the Koran and it wouldn't help if they wrapped it in this kind of paranoid secrecy.

Posted by: Anne at June 29, 2005 11:17 AM