"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

July 07, 2005
I Sure Am Glad

Halliburton lands $5 billion in new work for Army

Reuters reported Wednesday that the U.S. Army has inked a deal with Halliburton Co. to do about $5 billion in new work in Iraq.

Halliburton's logistics contract with the Army has so far earned the Houston-based oilfiled services and engineering and construction firm $9.1 billion.

Linda Theis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Army Field Support Command in Rock Island, Ill., said the military signed the work order with Halliburton unit KBR in May.

The new deal, worth $4.97 billion over the next year, was not made public when it was signed because the Army did not consider such an announcement necessary, she said.

Halliburton (NYSE: HAL), which has drawn allegations for overcharging on contracts and claims of favoritism from the White House, is the U.S. military's biggest contractor in Iraq with multiple tasks ranging from cooking meals for troops to rebuilding Iraq's oil industry.

I sure am glad we aren't running short of money to subsidize fund Halliburton the military in the course of our illegal invasion of war on Iraq 'terror'.

U.S. analyst says it is time to end alliance

It's South Korea, this time. They're cramping Uncle Sam's ability to flex his manhood on the Korean peninsula.

An analyst writing for a conservative U.S. think tank has suggested in a recent publication that the United States should end its half-century alliance with South Korea because the relationship constrains Washington's political and military options with regard to North Korea.

Apparently that diplomacy stuff isn't what the rightwing was looking for to feed their lunatic base.

Using strong language, Mr. Kennelley wrote: "Our current alliance with South Korea ― the diplomatic straitjacket ― prevents us from acting. South Korea will never let us use our sticks." Mr. Park said he believed sentiments similar to Mr. Kennelly's were becoming more common in U.S. political circles.

I think Mr. Kennelley should keep his stick in his pants and his warmongering to himself.

Mr. Park said he believed sentiments similar to Mr. Kennelly's were becoming more common in U.S. political circles.

I sure am glad that the fact that we're already losing fighting two wars isn't stopping us from eyeballing the rest of the ol' Axis for our next target.

Wouldn't want Halliburton to run out of government contracts, would we?

I sure am glad I bothered to get out of bed and read the news headlines today.

Posted by AnneZook at 12:01 PM


I'm a perpetual sophomore when it comes to international relations, but it would seem that the single best chance we have of eliminating the nuclear threat on the Korean penninsula would be to facilitate reunification between North and South Korea. And the worst thing we could do would be to give North Korea more reason to fear us.

In other words, Mr. Kennelley's idea is just plain dumb.

Posted by: Joseph j7uy5 at July 7, 2005 03:25 PM

I have a vague memory of reading an article (today? yesterday?) where North Korea said it wouldn't pursue nukes if we'd promise not to invade them.

I'm over-simplifying, of course, but I don't doubt that quite a few countries are feeling the urge to beef up their self-defense arsenals these days.

Posted by: Anne at July 11, 2005 04:25 PM