"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

July 20, 2005
Journalism

Looks like the Cleveland Plains is still trying to find a way to report those two anonymously sourced then withheld stories.

Anonymous sourcing is coming under greater scrutiny from all sides.

It doesn't look like Judith Miller is going to be winning a journalism award for her bravery in protecting Rove her anonymous source.

"The First Amendment is designed to prevent government interference with a free press. Miller, by shielding a government official or officials who attempted to use the press to retaliate against a whistleblower, and scare off other would-be whistleblowers, has allied herself with government interference with, and censorship of, whistleblowers," Bartholomew wrote in a resignation letter provided to E&P. "When your source IS the government, and the government is attempting to use you to target a whistleblower, the notion of shielding a source must be reconsidered. To apply standard practices regarding sources to hiding wrongdoing at the highest levels of government perverts the intent of the First Amendment.

Bartholomew resigned in protest over the organization's plans to award Miller the "Conscience in the Media" award, and his wasn't the only resignation.

And, speaking of types of journalism, let's cast our eyes toward New York and The House That AIDS Built. (Content may be disturbing)

Done with that? Okay, now read this.

Now read this.

I haven't the faintest idea what to think or what to believe. I know that drug trials for children and infants are woefully lacking, and darned hard to arrange. We don't know the effects of most drugs on infants because very few parents are going to let their babies be experimented on.

On the other hand, I find the level of deliberate callousness on the part of the involved medical professionals suggested by Scheff's article impossible to believe. I've worked with doctors* and I don't believe I know one who would in any way abuse a patient, especially an infant. And yet, my brain reminds me, I'm not in the center of the clinical trial world and thus cannot speak for what happens when valuable research, which this undoubtedly was, is under consideration.

As for the "known toxicities", cited with such breathless revelation, there are darned few drugs on the market that don't have known toxicities. Tylenol and Advil, to name just two, have well-documented toxicities. Administered improperly, almost any drug can prove to be toxic. That's just scaremongering. Equally, many reputable and successful disease treatments have potential side-effects (hair loss from chemotherapy treatments for cancer patients) that are frequently only temporary.

And yet...missing records? Documents "misplaced" that later show the number of enrolled children to be over five times what was originally reported? Not all children's legal guardians gave permission for them to be part of the experiment?

And yet...and yet....

Sometimes reading the Independent News Media makes my head hurt.

(Necessary Disclaimer: I work for a company that does business with pharmaceutical companies, although not specifically AIDS treatment.)

Posted by AnneZook at 07:48 AM


Comments

My ability to actually read these kinds of stories has been considerably curtailed since the birth of my son. I used to be able to be appalled and outraged without actually being sickened and frightened. That's not true anymore.

Don't these doctors have families?

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at July 20, 2005 06:58 PM

I don't even have children, and these stories upset me.

And yet...my limited knowledge of the field suggests that there's a lot of bias in the "independent" report.

Posted by: Anne at July 21, 2005 08:37 AM