"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

October 11, 2005
What's interesting to you?

Who would have guessed that Bolton would have turned out to be such an ass? Ummm...quite a few of us? Heh.

Wondering what charities to donate your aid money to for Pakistan? Over at Cliopatria, Manan Ahmed offers a list.

Jeff Alworth at Low on the Hog is asking, National Coming Out Day. If anyone has been waiting for the right moment....

Over at PressThink, Jay Rosen has a long entry about the NYTimes and Judith Miller. To be honest, I'm still confused by all of that. Miller has a rep for cozying up to government sources, and not just ones on the Right. She must have been producing stories her employer found important over the years, because she's been in the hotseat before and she's still employed.

I guess maybe my brain is still stuck on the question of why she, and not Novak, the guy who actually publishedValerie Plame's name, is under investigation. (I suspect someone explained this to me before and I've forgotten.)

Emergency evacuations plans for pets? Why is Congress going to be addressing that when we can't even get people out of harm's way? Prometheus 6 is right. This is some bullshit right here.

Avedon Carol, always good, has a couple of very interesting posts up right now. Check out Liberals for liberalism especially. (You may have to scroll down.)

Those of you pondering politics and wondering what's wrong with our politics today could do worse than to include some analysis of Republican Dirty Tricks over the last 25 years in your consideration. I intend to read the full article closely myself.

Over at HuffPo (is that the accepted abbreviation for the Huffington Post these days?), David Sirota posts on Making the "Strong," "Tough," & "Macho" Case for Withdrawal.

Today's, "Well, duh winner, unusually enough, is Josh Marshall, at Talking Points. He advances the astonishing theory (also linking to Matt Yglesias) that maybe the invasion of Iraq was doomed from the start and would have been doomed, regardless of who was leading it. Except he argues that if there had been WMD, then maybe we would have been successful. (And, you know, if I had won the lottery, then I'd be rich today, which goes to show how much postulating an alternative reality is worth. Because the odds were stacked heavily against Iraq having any WMD and many people were saying that, before we invaded them.) Or maybe he's not arguing that. I dunno. I don't usually have any trouble following what Mr. Marshall says, but that post confused me.

Alex over at ACSBlog says go here, think about it, and then post a suggestion.

Jerome over at Bad Attitudes reminds us that the "Family Research Council" thinks women would be better of dead than protected against cancer.

Maybe we should all be keeping an eye on Missouri?

(P.S. Why are the Democrats so impotent?)

Posted by AnneZook at 01:50 PM


" He advances the astonishing theory (also linking to Matt Yglesias) that maybe the invasion of Iraq was doomed from the start and would have been doomed, regardless of who was leading it."

I forget if Marshall initially supported the invasion. Those of us who did are left to wonder if it would have gone better with better leadership. I honestly thought Blair was going to play a larger role in shaping post-War Iraq, and I trusted Blair much more than I trusted Bush. Still do.

Posted by: Lawrence Krubner at October 12, 2005 02:12 PM

I think Marshall supported is...conditionally.

(Those of us who never supported it at all would like those of you who supported it to understand that there was almost no conceivable way it would have turned out any differently. Marginally better in some ways, with more competent, more honest leadership, yes, but more competent, more honest leadership would have invaded a tiny, nonagressive country even if it was making rude faces at us.)

Posted by: Anne at October 13, 2005 10:46 AM