"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

November 16, 2005
Rewriting history?

I desperately want to discuss this but I don't even know where to start.

It has to be said that while there were voices of sanity calling for a slowdown in the rush to war, the ones from people in power were few and far between.

Congress was successfully stampeded into voting the Bush Administration carte blanche authority to do whatever the heck it wanted to do and Congress has only itself to blame for this. You can't blame The Peepul for this one. The country was mobilizing for war before most of them knew it. The blame rests squarely on Congress.

Blame. Congress. Ours is a system of checks and balances, and it offered neither.

And Bush's much-reviled Veteran's Day Speech? The one so many of you are using to "prove" he's telling lies about who had what intelligence? You're letting yourselves be tricked. Again.

Because, once again, a close reading of what he actually said reveals that he's implying much that he's not actually saying.

The money quote:

And many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in the Congress this way: "When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security." That's why more than a hundred Democrats in the House and the Senate -- who had access to the same intelligence -- voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power. (Applause.)

Bush isn't saying that the House and Senate had the same intelligence that the White House said. He's saying that they had the same intelligence that Kerry was talking about.

You may think this is semantic nitpicking but I promise you, this is the kind of misdirection that will keep him out of jail. It's the kind of line-walking that allows him to look you in the eye (or at least, look a camera in the eye) and say he's not lying to the American Peepul.

Stop hearing what he wants you to hear and listen to what he's saying.

It's 2005 and now we're having the debate and the investigation we should have had before we killed something like 30,000 Iraqis, lost over 2,000 USofA soldiers, impoverished our country, nearly bankrupted Iraq, and destabilized the entire Middle East for decades to come, along with creating a whole new generation of terrorists with darned good reasons to hate the USofA.

And you're acting like a bunch of two year-olds. "Oooo, shiny!" And then you're off to chase the lastest bubble, letting yourselves be distracted from the real issues. Makes me crazy.

Bush lied? People died. What he's saying today is less important, critically less important, than keeping the pressure on what happened then.

Bush lied. People died. This is the headline that captures the attention of those who aren't sure, who haven't decided, or who haven't been paying attention.

We need to know if it's true, and we won't find that out by listening to him making bitter speeches today.

Posted by AnneZook at 09:14 AM


Comments