"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

November 25, 2005
Ye Olde Blogaround

A tiny handful of the stories around the world o'blog today.

I'm amused by how many bloggers picked up the story of Brown's plan to counsel other unqualified disaster relief types.

Over at Cliopatria, Ralph Luker is talking about the Constitution and the Joseph Padilla case, with a link to an interesting analysis that, unfortunately, spends a lot of time discussing the actual case against Padilla. In my mind, Padilla's guilt or innocence is, has to be irrelevant in this case. What needs to be addressed is the Bush Administration's blithe refusal to acknowledge that they are subject to Constitutional constraints.

And Chris Bray has a very interesting question about the potential for attempted genocide in Iraq. Don't miss the comments and the links there.

Avedon Carol is right, as she answers Kevin Drum's frustration about how to you explain that torture is wrong. You can't "reason" someone into understanding that. They either get it or they don't. (And if they don't, they're dangerous.) The fact that so many people in our society lack the intuitive understanding of this fundamental moral principle highlights that we're an increasingly sick society.

Cathy From Canada has a creepy entry discussing Chris Matthews' delight in discussing torture. He's interviewing FBI interrogator Joe Navarro, ostensibly about his new book. Navarro, of course, is trying to make the point that torture doesn't work and that rational people don't even want to use it. After a time in which Chris desperately tries to get Navarro to give him the juice on some actual torture techniques (Cathy is right, it's obvious that Matthews didn't even open the book), this telling exchange:

MATTHEWS: If it doesn't work, why does the mob use it? Don't they use it to find out who ratted who out? They used to do it in the movies. NAVARRO: They use it because they are psychopaths, Chris.

Some people seriously need to get their dosages checked. And some men need to spend a lot less time watching and worshipping The Godfather.

Over at Ahistoricality, there's a regrettable tendency to encourage me to rant, but the same post includes a link to the delightful Interview With A Yeti.

Posted by AnneZook at 10:12 AM


Comments

"How come we can't fly? It works in the movies!" Geez, do these people realize how stupid they sound?

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at November 25, 2005 05:04 PM

Even my four-year-old understands the distinction between Mary Poppins and Julie Andrews (to take one example).

Part of the problem is that physical abuse and other forms of torture do work some of the time: in intelligence situations, though, the stakes for misinformation and bias confirmation (telling the interrogator what they want to hear) are so high that the error rate should be considered unacceptable.

And, as the earlier case posted by Ralph Luker should make clear to the "ticking bomb" folks (yes, that's a double-edged comment), interrogation with torture is no shortcut or time-saver.

Aside from the fact that it makes a mockery of our criminal justice system, our principles, any number of international agreements we've signed, even championed, our condemnations of penal institutions elsewhere.... it doesn't work.

I'm sorry, but if none of these arguments works, then "psychopath" may be the next necessary level of argumentation....

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at November 25, 2005 10:53 PM