"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

February 18, 2006
My world o'blogs

Via Prometheus 6, a review of The God Genome.

Maybe it's just the reviewer's way of writing that makes me dislike author Daniel C. Dennett even without reading his book? Or maybe the reviewer dislikes him?

"In his own opinion, Dennett is a hero. He is in the business of emancipation, and he reveres himself for it."

"Dennett flatters himself that he is Hume's heir."

Hint to all you wannabe immortals out there? Don't flatter yourself. If you deserve the accolade, the world will bestow it upon you. Awarding yourself a title actually makes you look less worthy.

Anyhow, the only reason I mention it is because of the Christoph Niemann cartoon reprinted on Prometheus 6's site. It was breathtaking.


You don't need me to tell you to read Josh Marshall daily, but this was worth requoting:

"Having admitted unparalleled corruption, defendant Randall H. Cunningham now comes before the Court to be sentenced for his stunning betrayal of the public trust."

Randy Cunningham gets sentenced (TPM has the whole document in their collection) and the memorandum starts with a nice, hard smack in the head.

It's a beautiful sentence, isn't it?


A less-beautiful entry from Sisyphus Shrugged, a good entry about four stories on the military.

Posted by AnneZook at 03:52 PM


I would take Wieseltier's review with a huge grain of salt. Personally, I think his disgust with Dennett's book simply reflect the fact that his own religious sensibilities were offended. Dennert is a philosopher and an expert on the subjects of evolution and consciousness. Wieseltier is none of the above. His simply adopting a withering and erudite tone does not make him correct.

Posted by: Bob at February 19, 2006 12:00 AM

"Maybe it's just the reviewer's way of writing that makes me dislike author Daniel C. Dennett even without reading his book?"

Just out of curiosity, have you read either much Wieseltier or Dennett before? This sentence seems to suggest you're unfamiliar with either of them, but perhaps it's just a quirk of the phrasing.

If you're not familiar with them, I'd recommend much of both author's rather vast bodies of work over the decades as worthwhile. Naturally, I also disagree with each of them on a variety of matters (Wieseltier being vastly more eclectic, given his decades as literary editor at TNR, and, well, decades of eclecticism; Dennett pretty much stays with philosophy of mind, and lately his anti-religion crusade; however, I'd say that Dennett on the nature of consciousness, and on cognition, can be quite fascinating, though also quite debatable; his colloboration with Hofstadter on The Mind's I was also quite interesting, I thought, as one might imagine).

Posted by: Gary Farber at February 19, 2006 12:23 AM

It did seem to me, Bob that the reviewer had an axe to grind. I guess I should just be glad that he was obvious enough that his bias showed, even to the casual reader.

Thanks for the suggestions, Gary. I might try either of these guys on some other topic (and now that you've refreshed my memory, I'm sure I've read Dennett in the past).

Posted by: Anne at February 19, 2006 09:55 AM