"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

February 19, 2006
Evolving Social Systems

Gay marriage debate centers on history vs. change

Gosh. That's a big surprise.

Opponents say same-sex marriage is - among other things - a historical contradiction. Marriage, they say, has always been between a man and a woman and the laws are written to reflect that.

That argument echoes reasoning that has been proffered time and again to defend such outmoded laws as those that defined wives as the property of their husbands, or that prohibited divorce, or even

In the first place, saying that marriage has "always" been between a man and a woman just isn't true.

In the second place, it's not just "change," it's "progress."

It's the same kind of social evolution that, for instance, allows rightwing radio hosts to call for the deaths of liberals without getting lynched. Or for rightwing so-called "pundits" to call for the deaths of prominent politicians without getting tossed into jail without benefit of trial.

And, yes, that makes it illegal for us to buy and sell other human beings, no matter what their skin color or ethnicity.

But Katherine Spaht, a law professor at Louisiana State University and an expert on family law, said permitting gay marriage would constitute a change more profound than any other in history.

"Most of the changes, historically, have been at the edges of the concept of marriage, not at its core," Spaht said. "We've changed lots of things about the relationship between married people, but not as much about the fundamental idea of what marriage is."

Yeah, well, no. Because I'm kinda thinking that the whole thing about women-as-chattel was a pretty radical change in its day. The idea that not only was a married woman not just another kind of table or household fixture owned by a man, but a human being entitled to ownership of her own property and even her own body caused a certain amount of comment, back in the day.

And I'm thinking that interracial marriage was pretty traumatic for a lot of people. I mean, I've heard rumors to that effect, you know?

Apparently, Ms. Spaht's study of law didn't include any study of even comparatively recent history.

And I'm thinking that two people getting married is pretty much two people getting married, so it's not so much a change in the fundamental idea as she thinks. That whole "procreation" thing doesn't hold a lot of water in these days.

Of course, I'm also thinking that homosexuality, while proscribed at various times in various places, really hasn't been the focus of as much targeted hatred and repression during most of history as it is in the USofA today. In a lot, an awful lot of historical societies, people had real problems to worry about.

Posted by AnneZook at 07:16 PM


Comments

It's a damned shame we have to keep making this argument, isn't it? This view of history that seems to run straight from Genesis to present, with the rest of the world as "other, probably perverted" is pretty sticky.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at February 20, 2006 02:08 AM

Every single time our society recognizes its own deficiencies and moves to take a step forward, we get these frightened reactionaries demanding that we stop the world in its orbit and prevent things from changing.

I get that change is scary, but part of what being a responsible adult is is learning to cope with the fear, and even moving past it to the discovery.

Posted by: Anne at February 21, 2006 10:34 PM