"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

February 21, 2006
Ports

What bothers me a lot about the port security story is not that the company in question is from the UAE. It's the revelation, over the past couple of days, of the fact that almost all USofA ports are "owned" (i.e., leased) by foreign companies.

But, speaking of the UAE, it seemed to me that the UAE or Dubai...those were names I'd heard in the past, connected with the Bush Administration.

Searching, I found a Google cache of an article removed from the Gulfnews site, datelined UAE. It's headlined, " Bush's family long ago entangled themselves in Middle East dealings."

Dynasties in American politics are dangerous. We saw it with the Kennedys, we may well see it with the Clintons and we're certainly seeing it with the Bushes.

Between now and the November election, it's crucial that Americans come to understand how four generations of the current president's family have embroiled the United States in the Middle East through CIA connections, arms shipments, rogue banks, inherited war policies and personal financial links.

And I found an article (well, a couple of dozen) about Neil Bush (of Silverado fame) "fishing" in the UAE for investors for his software company that supposedly helped students improve "standardized test scores." (You know what those are. Those are the kinds of tests the Bush Administration's NCLB act relies so heavily upon. But I'm sure the legislation was just a happy coincidence.) Not much light on the current situation in that.

Wayne Madsen at CounterPunch had a story in July of '02, about the selling out of the Fourth Estate. Among stories he seems to feel the media was failing to cover? One that tied the UAE, Neil Bush, and the Taliban all together. Or...let's say showed they were linked by a sort of 6 Degrees Of Corruption kind of thing.

And then there's the Dubai, USofA, currency story. (Thank goodness for Google's cache program.)

The point is, my memory wasn't at fault. I've heard of the Bush family and the UAE linked together before, especially Dubai. Which makes this latest deal so much less surprising. It's the same sort of cronyism we've seen in the Bush Administration dealing with USofA corporations, isn't it?

Or maybe I spoke too soon and I should have put more research and thought into the state of the UAE. I don't know. Not everyone agrees with that view.

On the other hand, is Atrios right? Is the point not that it's a foreign country, but that it's a corporation owned by a foreign government?

But does it matter?

Because, what I really want to know? Is why can't we "own" our own ports?

I mean, we've allocated hundreds of millions of dollars for "homeland security" in the past few years. What are we spending it on besides making airports a nightmare to navigate?

Posted by AnneZook at 07:47 PM


Comments

"It's the revelation,"

Revelation? What revelation? It's perfectly public knowledge, and always has been.

But, then, so far as I can see, there's nothing to the current port story save Fear Of Dark-Skinned People, I'm afraid. Much demagoguery, absolutely nothing whatever to worry about, as anyone who follows port security issues will tell you. We have lots of extremely important port security issues to worry about, some of which I've written about over the years, but where the corporate headquarters of the book-keepers is -- which is what this boils down to -- is not one of them.

See, for instance, here, here, here, and here.

Or ask someone who knows from port security issues, and didn't discover the issue last week.

Posted by: Gary Farber at February 22, 2006 08:17 PM