"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 05, 2006
Stand Up and Salute

I'm going to start paying more attention to local matters.

So, look at Talking Points Memo. Here and here and here and here and here.

It started here and do read this original post because it brings up some good points, not the least of which is the idea that the Republican Party could be getting government assistance on finding and targeting local active duty personnel in various places.

It's local, but it's also national.

Fearing that they're losing their rep and the go-to guys on warmongering "security" issues and building on their practice of trying to make draft-avoider Bush look like a macho man by staging warlike photo-ops, the Republicans have now decided that Republican events should be attended by soldiers in uniform.

It doesn't matter if they're stage props or willing participants, the soldiers are inviting court-martial.

Beyond that, it does incalculable damage to our military, as Marshall discusses, and it does incalculable damage to our political processes by "framing" all public Republican speakers as part of the military community and "strong on defense."

To make it appear as though the Republican Party has the full and willing backing of our armed forces is a chilling strategy.

Posted by AnneZook at 12:46 PM


Comments

Just as the Republican congress protects the President from impeachment, the Republicanization of the military has protected politicized soldiers from courts martial.

I don't believe that the equation between Republican and military interests is a complete one: the military establishment has been quite nervous about some of the concrete "reforms" promoted by this administration, but this is why it's important to distinguish between attacks on policy and attacks on institutions (when they don't deserve it)....

Posted by: Ahistoricality at March 5, 2006 01:46 PM

Yes, I know that the military has been nervous, but they're also led, at the highest levels, by political appointees.

I'd like to see a little public outcry about this. Whether these soldiers understand what they're doing or not, I'd rather they weren't the only ones who got into trouble for this.

Posted by: Anne at March 6, 2006 08:16 PM