"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 08, 2006
I Take the Fifth

I'm Major General Geoffrey Miller, and I took the military equivalent of the Fifth Amendment so I wouldn't have to testify about whether or not soldiers at Abu Ghraib were acting under orders or not.

The article insists that he used this protection so he wouldn't have to answer questions he's answered before, but I've read that about others in other stories and I'm not impressed. Getting at the truth sometimes does mean repeating the same things to different people.

While I'm awfully sorry that the Major General and other superior officers are so bored by the whole thing, I think they owe it to themselves, enlisted personnel at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, and the professionalism of the military as a whole to suck it up and answer the questions as often as necessary.

Posted by AnneZook at 07:27 PM


Comments

If Rumsfeld wasn't trying to cover this up, Miller would have been a retired Major the day after he invoked Article 31. He would accept being busted for the good of the Service.

You have the right, but you don't ever invoke it unless you are sure you are about to be court martialed.

Posted by: Bryan at March 8, 2006 08:57 PM

I understand the concern with equating "taking the Fifth" as a refusal to admit your own guilt for something. I understand that that isn't necessarily the case.

I just don't understand what it means in this context, you know? (Not that I was really fantasizing that Rumsfeld, et. al. were enthusiastically pursuing the truth of our torture of prisoners.)

Posted by: Anne at March 9, 2006 10:14 AM

If he doesn't invoke Article 31 [military version of the 5th] he has to answer all of the questions put to him, and those questions would probably involve not only orders he gave, but the orders he received.

A two-star isn't very high in the Pentagon food chain, so there were people above him giving him direction. He has to be protecting someone, and that person is supplying him cover.

In normal times he would never appear on a promotion list, because the list would be blocked by a Senator.

This is just another example of things that have never occurred before in the military.

Posted by: Bryan at March 9, 2006 06:30 PM

"Never appeared before"?

That's very interesting.

Posted by: Anne at March 12, 2006 11:26 AM