"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

March 12, 2006
Today In History

On March 12, 1868, the Senate began Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

(Article 2)

Impeachment Impeachment, in the U.S. and Great Britain, proceeding by a legislature for the removal from office of a public official charged with misconduct in office. Impeachment comprises both the act of formulating the accusation and the resulting trial of the charges; it is frequently but erroneously taken to mean only the removal from office of an accused public official. An impeachment trial may result in either an acquittal or in a verdict of guilty. In the latter case the impeached official is removed from office; if the charges warrant such action, the official is also remanded to the proper authorities for trial before a court.

(link)

Meyerson makes his case that the Bush Administration may be a "malevolent presidency" but it's not impeachable.

Not quite yet because while deliberately breaking the law by spying on USofA citizens without a warrant is a crime, the current make-up of the Judiciary Committee pretty much guarantees this Administration isn't going to find their feet held to the fire until all the facts come out. (Note: While I was pleasantly surprised by the outrage of Republicans initially, it seems to me that much of their outrage is dying down. As with the Patriot Act reauthorization.) (On the other hand, it could just be that the national media is getting bored of the story since meetings in committee and exchanges of memos don't make for dramatic news coverage.)

Republicans set the bar pretty low during the Clinton Administration, essentially impeaching the guy for being a popular Democrat who had sex (and as revenge for Nixon).

This is the only reason I haven't been beating the impeachment drum more loudly. I really don't want to get into a tit-for-tat exchange of impeachments for every presidential administration from now until the end of time.

Is the Bush Administration guilty of "gross misconduct" or just idiotic tunnel-vision, refusing to see that reality cannot be bent to fit their visions? (As history has so often shown the neo-cons are.) We don't know yet.

But the one thing I'm really annoyed about this morning is the idea that we can't punish the Executive Branch for actual crimes because we know Republicans will act like spoilt six year-olds in retaliation.

We don't have a single political party in this country that doesn't need dismantling and rebuilding from the ground up.

I'm going to go ponder this column that suggests our real enemy is "Market Fundamentalism" and offers the idea of a "moral economy."

________________

* I am willing to believe there were those who believed there was actually wrongdoing in the Clinton Administration. After all, there are those who don't see anything wrong with how the Bush Administration is running this country and it's wars. (I'm inclined to think they're the same group of people.)

Posted by AnneZook at 10:08 AM


Comments