"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 05, 2006
Wherein I show bad taste in jokes

You know the Bush Administration? The people who put anti-feminist men in charge of women's health issues? Who appoint representatives from industries to the government watchdog agencies assigned to keep those industries within the law? Who appoint lobbyists to the positions they used to lobby?

Add this to the list. A man arrested for exposing and masturbating himself in front of a 16 year-old girl used to be the guy in charge of...wait for it...Homeland Security's "Predator." That's the agency designed, yes, to bust child sex criminals.

I suppose, in their own way, the Bush Administration thinks of this as appointing "experts in the field" to various positions.

__________________

I know. This entry is wrong on so many levels.

Posted by AnneZook at 06:22 PM


Comments

I can't be the only one who's unhappy about Homeland Security, ostensibly created to protect us from terrorists, using resources to chase sex criminals instead.

We already had, and still do have, multiple agencies to handle that.

Posted by: Walter at April 5, 2006 06:49 PM

The only justification I could see would be if there was enough methodological overlap between terrorist and pedophile organizations to justify applying their expertise (what expertise?) to both tasks.

As for the original article, I'm nearly speechless. Talk about taking your work home with you....

Posted by: Ahistoricality at April 5, 2006 07:54 PM

That is the second arrest in two days of DHS employees for a sex crime involving a minor. What exactly did we get for the money spent on background checks?

Posted by: Bryan at April 5, 2006 07:57 PM

I can't believe, Ahistoricality, that there's actually someone capable of making a worse joke about this than I made. :)

As for your point about methodological overlap? I'm thinking...not.

Bryan - We all know what we got for the money we spent. Republicans. Not, I think, the best value.

And, Walter, no, you're not alone in that. The only thing dumber than creating a "homeland security" department, instead of funding the estalished departments and agencies who should be dealing with security issues, is the way they're rolling every piece of the government they can touch into the stupid thing.

Posted by: Anne at April 5, 2006 09:48 PM

"Background checks" were an imperfect filter at their best, and they've been getting worse over the last twenty years as the number of people processed by increasingly civilian contract employees (lots of former military/police types in "retirement") rises and the kinds of questions the checkers can ask have been severely restricted.

You can vet the guy all you want; you're not going to discover a propensity for sex crimes if he hasn't comitted them yet, and even if you do, there's real questions about what you can do about it, in terms of employment.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at April 6, 2006 01:38 AM

That's quite true, Jonathan.

I hesitated about making the post because I don't want anyone to think that I believe the government (or anyone) should be should be responsible for spotting an incipient criminal. (In the end, the chance to take a cheap potshot at the Bush Administration was just too much to resist....)

Obviously no one could have known that these guys had or would develop these problems.

I'd caution the Lefthand world o'blog against making too much of this, though. That can backfire.

The Right is already blowing the McKinney thing 'way out of proportion to distract the public from these sex scandals (and she's playing right into their hands). there's not much that's "beneath" the current Administration.

Also? The Left is not immune. We have no ideas what skeletons might lurk in our own closet.

Posted by: Anne at April 6, 2006 07:04 PM