"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

August 29, 2008
Bad Language From Me

I've watched with interest, sympathy, and empathy, the rage that supporters and other women around the world o'blog have expressed over the misogynistic treatment of Hillary Clinton.

I have agreed with pretty much everything I've read. Criticize the woman on her policies, or her compromises, on her beliefs, or on her experience, but for god's sake shutthefuckup about the color of her clothes, the style of her hair, the timbre of her voice, and/or her private relationship with her husband.

Give us no more of your nitpicking on shows of emotion or the lack of the same. Ditto for the rest of the "coverage" we've seen that has failed to be about anything of substance.

The national "news" media is a disgraceful excuse for a "free press" and it's not surprising that the opposition has jumped on their every reference, trying to make hay out of nothing.

It is, therefore, with regret and even disgust that I'm witnessing the performance of the Lefter World O'Blog this morning.

So far, working my way through my daily list, I'm encountering mostly male-written or male-dominated blogs and the number of references I've seen to Palin's youth and attractiveness are starting to piss me off.

You can call her inexperienced because she is inexperienced, but shutthefuckup with the not-so-subtly coded inferences that, because she's attractive she must be stupid. Stop with the sly smirks and the little-boy oh, I'm so naughty sexual innuendo. Just. Shut up.

Criticize her on her record or her lack of the same. Criticize what she believes or doesn't believe.Criticize her on what she's done, or what she's failed to do.

But? One. More. Reference. To her sexual desirability? And I'm going to do something dreadful. To all of you.

Posted by AnneZook at 11:42 AM


Comments

Mostly agree (and not just in self-defense), but I can't help but think that her children's names ("Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper and Trig") tell us something about her judgement and character.....

Posted by: Ahistoricality at August 29, 2008 02:16 PM

Also, it's entirely probably that her gender, youth and attractiveness were part of McCain's political calculation: given her minimal track record, and the way she effectively neutralizes his own attacks on Obama, I find it hard to believe that he's not trying to leverage Historictm and charismatic into benefits for his campaign.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at August 29, 2008 02:19 PM

In terms of your first comment, general meanness tempts me to agree--except that we've had male candidates for office who have children with unusual names and I don't remember it being a campaign issue.

IN terms of your second comment, I'd agree, IF the blog posts I'd read had been written to those matters. I know I can be a little trigger-happy where my hot-buttons are concerned, but, to quote one example, "American Street"--asking if she was his running mate or hired to jump out of his birthday cake--posts like that are the kind of thing I'm objecting to.

In other words, not posts where it's a matter of interpretation and subjective judgment as to what the poster intended to say.

Posted by: Anne at August 29, 2008 03:52 PM

I really don't remember ever running across a politician at that level (or even close to it) with names quite this uniformly bad, or this many of them (actors and musicians, sure), but really it's mostly a tongue-in-cheek thing: if we tick off the "parents who give their kids freaky, cliched and stupid names" demographic, we're going down in flames..... it's a bipartisan issue, for sure.

Maybe I've just settled on a nice, narrow and fairl professional (also generally feminist) portion of the political blogosphere -- TPM and Sideshow account for a lot of my political browsing -- but I haven't seen what you have. I believe it, mind you (the TPM comments section is quite the rough-and-tumble, though not at a dKos level), but it hasn't filtered through my list yet.

The closest thing I've seen is comments pointing out that McCain seems to have a thing for pretty, younger women, having married two of them and now picked an otherwise underqualified one to be his running mate. I see that much more as a commentary on McCain, though.

I think the worst thing we could do is underestimate Palin, or McCain. We've been getting caught short by these so-called stupid Republicans for twenty years now, starting with Quayle.....

Posted by: Ahistoricality at August 29, 2008 08:59 PM

I'm a bit behind in blog-reading, but fortunately almost all the Palin critiques I've come across so far deal with her amazing level of corruption (pretty astounding considering how relatively little time she's spent in office) rather than her looks.

Posted by: Elayne Riggs at August 30, 2008 10:01 AM

Can I stick my head up my own ass too and pretend I don't know what's been done to Sarah Palin? Can I pretend like I don't know that Kos' site started the rumor that her youngest child is actually her daughter's child? Can I pretend that Joe Biden hasn't pronounced his opponent "good looking"? Can I pretend that Talking Points Memo is anything but a hatefest towards women?

NO I CAN'T.

Posted by: Heather at September 3, 2008 09:31 AM