"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

September 10, 2008
I Didn't Want To Love Him

I should have just read Steve Benen and saved myself several hours of enraged typing.

Or, you know, have quoted Mr. Obama's speech.

I think I'm starting to fall in love with this candidate in spite of my long-standing cynicism about politicians and their speeches. He's saying the things I want to hear. He's saying that the issues matter. He's becoming ever-more adept at turning the conversation back to the issues, regardless of the media's chosen spin on any situation.

Posted by AnneZook at 11:54 AM


Obama's high-mindedness is enabled, ironically, by the media enviroment the Republicans have fostered for years, in which they will continue to flog things well past the pont of interest in the guise of "context" so nothing ever dies, even (especially?) when the candidate avoids the topic.

I'm not blaming Obama; it's chickens coming home to roost.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at September 10, 2008 12:32 PM

I'm not sure I followed where you were going with that one....

Posted by: Anne at September 10, 2008 12:56 PM

Me neither: I was in a hurry between class preps....

Let me try again. Due to the steady development of "gotcha" journalism, the personalization of politics, the hypersensitivity to (certain kinds of) hypocrisy in the press, and the relentless cycle of cable news, Obama doesn't have to get his hands dirty. To a large extent, the sheer inertia of the last fifteen years of "politics of destruction" ensures that a lot of the "going negative" happens without him.

He then gets the best of both worlds: the critical work gets done by bloggers and hacks (two different things!), and he gets to campaign against the media -- an old Republican trick, actually, that I've never understood but seems to work. "Working the refs" in the current parlance, shaming or frightening the media into covering the stuff you want and avoiding the topics you don't.

Don't get me wrong: I like what he's saying, how he's saying it. It's going to move things in the right direction, for a change, if it gets any traction. But it's not as radical as it looks.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at September 10, 2008 03:12 PM