"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

September 19, 2008
Talk Like A Crazy Man Day!

Okay, so McCain is saying Obama is an outsider without any national experience to qualify him to be president and, at the same time, Obama is a Washington insider who is responsible for the financial meltdown on Wall Street?

Do you ever wonder just how much (if any) mental dissonance the Right is experiencing, trying to believe all of McCain's ridiculous remarks?

(Do you ever wonder if the McCain campaign has just gone totally MAD?)

(Do you ever worry that even though his campaign has been exposed as a series of lies, half-truths, and ridiculous vagaries, an astonishing 50% of the voting population is still going to vote for him?)

Posted by AnneZook at 03:41 PM


Comments

(Do you ever worry that even though his campaign has been exposed as a series of lies, half-truths, and ridiculous vagaries, an astonishing 50% of the voting population is still going to vote for him?)

I always wonder that about Obama supporters!!!

Posted by: Tom at September 20, 2008 08:41 AM

All politicians, I agree, tell half-truths on a lot of occasions, and many times "truth" can be situational--it depends on your perspective.

But that's not the kind of thing I'm talking about right now. McCain's campaign has been outed by the national press for serial lying. They've told so many outright lies that people are having trouble keeping up with them all.

If you're a McCain supporter, do you find it causes you any mental dissonance believing all of these conflicting things at the same time?

Posted by: Anne at September 20, 2008 09:25 AM

Here's just one example (of many) that displays Obama's honesty and integrity. Please take a look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHnVZpA69j0&feature=related

I neither Republican or Democrat, but I don't think Republicans own the market on distorting and outright lying. I find it harder to get to the truth because of how both candidates deliver their messages.

Posted by: Tom at September 20, 2008 10:36 AM

The McCain/Palin campaign has repeated lies well after they were conclusively shown to be false, produced ads that were debunked in minutes and had to be withdrawn, and has repeatedly and consistently stonewalled attempts to clarify or learn anything about Palin's background.

Obama's campaign has exaggerated a few claims, as near as I can tell, but said nothing that was fundamentally untrue.

I haven't seen anyone truly even-handed or open-minded who doesn't see that.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at September 20, 2008 10:13 PM

So where does the line end on exaggeration and begin to be called lying? I was always taught that if I spoke half-truths, then it was known as lying. Both candidates are guilty of this to a great degree. I think you're rationalization is keeping you from being even-handed or open-minded on the topic.

Like I said, I'm neither Republican or Democrat, so I'm still deciding on who I will support in this election based on my personal morals and values. I'm being a lot more objective in my examination of these candidates than you may think.

Posted by: Tom at September 21, 2008 08:29 AM

Both candidates are guilty of this to a great degree.

Even if I grant you that, and I really don't, it's not to an equal degree.

If it's all or nothing, and you're looking for purity, vote for Nader or Paul (though both of them are at least as dishonest about the implications and likely results of their ideas as any other politician), or stay home.

If you're seriously looking for a way to distinguish between McCain and Obama, you need to find some other way to evaluate them, because this one clearly isn't working for you.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at September 21, 2008 10:24 AM