"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

February 24, 2009
We Have Met The Enemy And He Is Us

I've been trying to articulate something about the whole management-labor relationship in the 21st century, post-neocon-insanity (we hope) world. Because this is not my first time at this particular rodeo. I've been listening to employers mouth the same lame-assed platitudes for the last 25 years.

"Times are tough for all of us right now." (Inevitably handed out by someone making at least six figures when addressing a group of minimum wage workers.)

"We are the company." (Generally used by the only person in the room who actually has stock options.)

"We're all in this together." (A favorite of the entrepreneur-owner who spends their evening searching the job sites for someone who will do your job for less money.)

Management talks about "our company" as though we were, in fact, owners and not replaceable cogs in a temporary wheel.

I'm having Issues around this latest "economic downturn."

There are things people used to take for granted. The 40-hour work week. A certain level of job security. Raises.

Of course, raises may still be happening somewhere, but no one I know has gotten one in the last few years. Not only would you get laughed out of most of today's offices if you inquired about a "merit" raise, few people even get cost-of-living any more.

Vacation relief. (For the young'uns among you, that meant that when you were out of the office someone else did your work, so you didn't come back to a desk piled high and overflowing and, a week later, have to take a sick day to recover from the exhaustion of "catching up.")

Because we used to get medical insurance and paid sick time. If you were sick, you could take off work - go to the doctor or just stay home, avoid infecting the rest of the office, and still be able to pay your rent.

Today's trend is to give people a handful of days a year. If you get sick, then you get no vacation. So, people get sick and come to the office anyhow. (And pass around the plague, as happened in my office two or three weeks ago.)

And health insurance is no longer a given. Even for those of us whose employers offer coverage, it's more and more the thing to make us pay for at least part of it.

"By the way, while Inflation and the economy are making your dollar worth less every month, we need you to chip in on the cost of your medical insurance so we can keep paying our CEO $250,000 a year, because times are tough all over."

Since wages are going down, not up, people at or close to the poverty line (which, for a family of four with kids in or headed to college, is higher than you think) can't afford the contributions so they do without.

Complain to the HR department? Sorry, that was the first thing to go in last year's round of job cuts.

And, while we're on the subject, that guy sitting in the cubicle on your left and the gal in the cubicle on your right? They're both out of here as of noon today. You don't mind picking up the slack, right? Because you still have a job, don't you, and their work absolutely has to get done.

By making people pay for some of their traditional "benefits" and by cutting salaries and by cutting staff and then expecting the remaining staff to "take up the slack," well, it seems to me that "management" is trying to separate us from our wages.

This move is intended to dissolve the contract whereby we give them X number of hours in a week and, in return, they pay us X number of dollars.

It is their hope that we can be fooled into believing that the quantity and quality of work we do has nothing to do with the wages They pay us.

When and how did They get the power to do that?

We became complacent, didn't we? We stopped guarding our "rights."

As we moved from a manufacturing-based economy to a more white-collar economy, "labor unions" became just too blue-collar. Too tainted with the stigma of "lower-class."

We didn't need no unions. We were all upper-class, white-collar workers! We thought we'd made it.

We thought We were Them.

Guess They showed Us.


Sorry. I'm sure I was winding up to a slam-bang conclusion there, along with some bitter reflections on the abortive movement toward white-collar unions that died a quick death in the 80s, but someone brought in a baby today.

It's difficult to be aggravated when a baby laughs.

Posted by AnneZook at 01:02 PM


Soon wages will be eliminated altogether as the trend continues toward Plantation Planet: where 99% of the human population subsists on the equivalent of less than 1$ a day and the remaining 1% own everything.

Posted by: getaclue at March 3, 2009 10:39 AM

Not if we do the right thing today.

Posted by: Anne at March 4, 2009 10:04 AM