"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

October 21, 2009
Huh

For quite a few years now, I've driven by this one corner building out in the south part of town, glanced and the sign, and told myself I should really try to find out who "Intelligence Gaming, Inc." is. I mean, I like games and I certainly like intelligent games.

Sadly, today when I finally remembered to Google the organization, I found that they're a part of the (pardon the cliché) industrial-military complex. While also doing business under other names, they make no secret of their business. They list themselves boldly under a Defense Contractor SIC code.*

That's not really the kind of "serious games" I was thinking about.

An interview with the founder talks about flight training simulators, formulating battle strategies, and in some unspecified fashion, "intelligence."

Poking around more deeply, I see that their recent name-change could be more than just a cosmetic re-branding. On their new website, the front page speaks boldly of "preventing national security incidents." And their product descriptions, while cagey are easily interpreted.

Anyone else remember that Star Trek episode where those two countries/planets thought they'd "civilized" warfare by making it unnecessary to actually (pay for, and) send soldiers out to fight?

I dunno. Maybe reading about Atlantis is a better use of my lunch break.

___________________

* While they admit to annual revenues of up to a million and four or fewer employees, Dunn & Bradstreet estimates $5.5 million and 20 people respectively. As always, these contradictions intrigue me.

Posted by AnneZook at 02:48 PM


Comments

Huh.

On the Atlantis thing, I'm of the opinion now -- and of course I'm an expert on these things -- that Atlantis was always a myth (there's only one source, a known fabulist) and trying to match up any real remains or history to the myth is just a waste of time.

But it makes great headlines, and what they've found is genuinely interesting.

Posted by: Ahistoricality at October 21, 2009 08:31 PM

Oh, I feel the same way about Atlantis, except that I think it's like most myths. Cobbled-together bits of half-understood, long-ago events. I don'[t think the entire story is fabricated.

But the search, as you point out, is unveiling some fascinating things.

Posted by: Anne at October 22, 2009 08:30 AM