"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

May 12, 2010
Too Weird For Words

The military is considering issuing a medal to soldiers who don't kill people?

Does that make actual sense? No, it does not.

Yes, civilians get killed. They get raped and murdered. They get kidnapped and tortured--our own government was in the business for a while and hasn't actually shut down the program yet.

War brutalizes soldiers. It always has. That's a lot of what the "horrors of war" are all about, people. War brutalizes the soldiers and they pass it along.

You want to stop civilian war casualties?

Stop making war.

Posted by AnneZook at 04:27 PM


Comments

Well, that is odd. Would this be a kind of end-of-career thing, giving the medal to soldiers as a kind of consolation prize?

Posted by: Ahistoricality at May 12, 2010 07:35 PM

Heh.

Sorry, kiddo. You didn't win the body count lottery, but here's a small slab of gilded steel, to thank you for playing!

__________

Must. Rant.

I honestly don't know what's worse--putting young people in situations where these choices have to be made, or the DoD's current development of soldier-free killing machines, so they can make war all clean and tidy and prevent all of this liberal breast-beating over the poor soldiers.

I can't help but remember the Trek episode where the two planets had been at war for so long that all it took was for an alarm go to off and people willingly filed into death chambers--the computers had declared them dead, so they suicided. Is that where we're going?

Personally, I hate long-range missiles and machine guns and sniper rifles and air-dropped bombs. I don't even think soldiers should be given guns. Just knives.

Or maybe rocks and big sticks.

War should be as personal, as ugly, and as hard as possible. At least it's human that way. Making it tidy and sanitary is just--that's evil.

Posted by: Anne at May 14, 2010 03:01 PM

This is the arc of human history: I talk about this in my world history class. For at least the last thousand years, and arguably for longer, we've been developing ways to kill more and more people at greater and greater distances: spear, bow, crossbow; arquebus, musket, rifle, repeater, machine gun, automatic weapons; catapult, trebuchet, cannon, artillery, airships, airplanes, missiles; gunpowder, TNT, incendiaries, C4, atomics. The nuclear warhead-equipped ICBM is one of the highest human achievements, though the targeted drone is arguably going to surpass it, by being actually useful.

We need to develop ethically as we develop technologically. Gen. Bradley said that "Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants." We need to change that.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner at May 15, 2010 01:24 PM

I had NOT heard that quote before. That's excellent.

Posted by: Anne at May 21, 2010 10:47 PM